Rose of Dawn who identifies as trans but doesn't agree with much of the TRA stuff did a video some time ago, talking about how the movement was so limited in its political representation and agenda. They pointed out that others voices and views were actively suppressed and drowned out and this upset them greatly and they wanted to make that point. It was one of those light bulb moments for me.
The flag represents a very narrow political agenda. It's supposed to be about inclusion and diversity, but it's exactly the opposite in a huge number of ways. It's a symbol of suppression within the communities that it is supposed to include as a result of its narrative and narrow mindedness. There are literally books written on the politics of flags so I won't go into it too much here.
The point is it is effectively a call to arms - it's not nationalist because of what it represents - but if you think about it in those terms it makes sense. It is militant and it's intention is to force team, silence and intimidate.
I think the thing here is to listen to people who belong to groups it's supposed to represent. There's a fair number of this thread expressing a view that they don't like it and it doesn't represent them. Then look at the content of the scolders who ignore this but instead attack by trying to other and yes are force teaming.
It's a political flag, which is undermining the original pride flag and exposes gay rights to a political backlash. It has taken years for gay rights to get to where they are through moderate measured political pressure. This flags militancy seeks to aggressively attack and represents authoritarianism.
That leaves a lot of gay and disabled people alienated and exposed and there are others who recognise it is a threat to them because of its militancy. It is fair for all to be critical - and yes it does affect all those groups who have a right to say it is not a neutral flag. The scolders are keen to suggest it represents a peaceful, neutral group who mean no harm. The reality is different and we can see it.
It is a flag which seeks to dominate and suppress. It does not seek to represent. It seeks to exclude and to hijack other causes for its own benefit, often with a disregard for many of the unique issues these other groups have.
I honestly would be surprised if there was any discussion whatsoever relating to the sexuality and issues that disabled lesbians face - unless they are actually male or the target of sexual desire from a male perspective and not representative of the actual issues. And therein lies the entire problem. Default flag wavers ignore the minorities because they can but then claim legitimacy through the numbers their umbrella supposedly includes. It's a form of false inflation to legitimise.