Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Child excluded for using a ‘dead name’.

131 replies

OhForTheLoveOfMoney · 26/06/2024 20:27

I keep my GC credentials close to my chest but a friend has just told me this and I am so furious I had to share here. (I NC’d for anonymity as this is not my DC).

My friend’s DC has a friend that they have known since primary school. This friend has is now non-binary and changed their name. My friend’s DC, in all innocence, has used the name they have known their friend as for their entire life and has been excluded for dead naming and it has been cited as a hate crime.

FFS.

OP posts:
SuziQuinto · 27/06/2024 16:40

What is more likely is that the excluded child was abusive or bullying, and was reported for discrimination or harassment. The term "hate crime" is unlikely to have been used. They will have been warned about the behaviour.

SuziQuinto · 28/06/2024 22:41

I think it was the "unhealthy interest in weapons" which prompted the police visit, rather than any gender issue.

Anonym00se · 28/06/2024 22:46

blackice · 27/06/2024 00:39

Lol there's literally no way this is true

It doesn’t matter if it happened or not (and I’m guessing ‘not’). It’s still enough to make obsessed people with nothing better to do feel “furious”. And repeat it to countless others who will also feel furious.

AlisonDonut · 28/06/2024 23:03

SuziQuinto · 28/06/2024 22:41

I think it was the "unhealthy interest in weapons" which prompted the police visit, rather than any gender issue.

A toy sold ay English Heritage?

Perhaps it was going to an English Heritage shop? Bit racist right?

blackice · 29/06/2024 00:00

Anonym00se · 28/06/2024 22:46

It doesn’t matter if it happened or not (and I’m guessing ‘not’). It’s still enough to make obsessed people with nothing better to do feel “furious”. And repeat it to countless others who will also feel furious.

Totally agree

SuziQuinto · 29/06/2024 01:11

AlisonDonut · 28/06/2024 23:03

A toy sold ay English Heritage?

Perhaps it was going to an English Heritage shop? Bit racist right?

I have no idea what you're talking about. Where on earth does racism come into it? The referral to Prevent and the police visit did not happen because a child questioned issues about gender. This is one woman's report to the Daily Mail and I don't think that constitutes valid evidence.

GrammarTeacher · 29/06/2024 05:37

Yes it takes a lot more than that to make a Prevent referral.

Datun · 29/06/2024 05:51

Bloody hell. He had a toy crossbow from English Heritage.

ArseholeCatIsABlackAndWhiteCat · 29/06/2024 06:21

None of this story makes sense.

The kids are friends, and have been for years , but the non binary kid reported his friend for a "mistake"?

No crime was committed, but it was logged as a hate crime?

Add in the inflammatory title , because exclusion and internal exclusion are two completely different things and you're either deliberately stirring stuff up or you've only been given a quarter of a story and you ran with it.

CurlewKate · 29/06/2024 07:12

@AlisonDonut Did you read the link you posted all the way through? The videos the child concerned made were posted by his mother. He also said that "Hamas should be wiped out" and told a group of class mates that they should be "exterminated". And there were a "string of other allegations" There is concern that he is in danger of being radicalised. Based on that report alone I absolutely agree. He is obviously being manipulated by his appalling mother. It is a very good thing the situation is being investigated.

SuziQuinto · 29/06/2024 07:16

Excellent points, @CurlewKate , thank you. It certainly fills in the gaps.

PeskyPotato · 29/06/2024 07:16

If this happened at my eldests schools half the teachers would be in trouble as they get deadnamed constantly.

But thankfully they understand people make mistakes and it's not a hate crime.

Datun · 29/06/2024 07:24

CurlewKate · 29/06/2024 07:12

@AlisonDonut Did you read the link you posted all the way through? The videos the child concerned made were posted by his mother. He also said that "Hamas should be wiped out" and told a group of class mates that they should be "exterminated". And there were a "string of other allegations" There is concern that he is in danger of being radicalised. Based on that report alone I absolutely agree. He is obviously being manipulated by his appalling mother. It is a very good thing the situation is being investigated.

You left out that he's Jewish and:

"He is said to have made the remark in relation to appalling racist slurs from classmates.
In a letter to the school in South Tyneside - seen by the Mail - his mother detailed how he was subjected to vile verbal abuse and Nazi salutes."

EasternStandard · 29/06/2024 07:27

AlisonDonut · 27/06/2024 08:06

OP the problem is that so many people come on here saying 'I'm as GC as they come but...' and then post utter gubbins and then race back to Twix with screenshots as to how evil the FWR frothers are.

OP the problem is that so many people come on here saying 'I'm as GC as they come but...'

Yes you’re likely getting a fair few of these

SuziQuinto · 29/06/2024 07:28

I don't know the facts of this, @Datun , you obviously know more. However, if the child had reported at any stage antisemitic attacks, then that would have been acted on. It seems very strange that classmates were able to give Nazi salutes - grounds for an instant suspension - yet he was targeted in this way.
There seems to be a lot to unpick here.

ArseholeCatIsABlackAndWhiteCat · 29/06/2024 07:47

SuziQuinto · 29/06/2024 07:28

I don't know the facts of this, @Datun , you obviously know more. However, if the child had reported at any stage antisemitic attacks, then that would have been acted on. It seems very strange that classmates were able to give Nazi salutes - grounds for an instant suspension - yet he was targeted in this way.
There seems to be a lot to unpick here.

It's a really difficult and complicated one .

Prevent ,and referrals to it, are not a punishment.

The kid didn't actually do anything worthy of a punishment, except for the one comment about "exterminating" , but no consequences.

Bar that one, the reasons for reporting are quite tenuous. The concern was that he COULD be radicalised by far right groups once older.

The two videos used as "evidence" were published by his mother. Why? Just why?

Then we have the anti semitic comments /gestures and bullying of the boy. It could all be made up, it could be true but the school didn't deal with it, it could be true and the school dealt with it, but ineffectively.

Whatever is going on, it's a complete shit show.

SuziQuinto · 29/06/2024 07:53

@ArseholeCatIsABlackAndWhiteCat you're probably right.
I have experience reporting students to Prevent and the concerns which lead up to this. We always have the paper trail, and it's never done lightly. I also know that a police visit is very rare, I have seen the documentation for such circumstances.
I don't know of any school that would not act on Nazi salutes? - those students would be far more likely to be reported and monitored.

Awumminnscotland · 29/06/2024 08:01

OhForTheLoveOfMoney · 26/06/2024 20:27

I keep my GC credentials close to my chest but a friend has just told me this and I am so furious I had to share here. (I NC’d for anonymity as this is not my DC).

My friend’s DC has a friend that they have known since primary school. This friend has is now non-binary and changed their name. My friend’s DC, in all innocence, has used the name they have known their friend as for their entire life and has been excluded for dead naming and it has been cited as a hate crime.

FFS.

Are you in Scotland by any chance op?

PurpleBugz · 29/06/2024 08:03

I really can't believe people don't believe this?! My dd school behaviour or bullying policy until very recently (thank you Cass!!) had internal exclusion for deadnaming and the wrong pronouns. I think second offense had them fully excluded. I don't know if our school have actually enforced it but it was clear as day in the policies until after Cas

This shit has absolutely been happening in our schools.

ichbrauchenichts99 · 29/06/2024 08:04

You know that your opener isn't even remotely the full story OP.

Awumminnscotland · 29/06/2024 08:04

PurpleBugz · 29/06/2024 08:03

I really can't believe people don't believe this?! My dd school behaviour or bullying policy until very recently (thank you Cass!!) had internal exclusion for deadnaming and the wrong pronouns. I think second offense had them fully excluded. I don't know if our school have actually enforced it but it was clear as day in the policies until after Cas

This shit has absolutely been happening in our schools.

Totally agree

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2024 08:06

OhForTheLoveOfMoney · 27/06/2024 07:56

I don’t know how long the internal exclusion is for. I work in primary and didn’t realise that internal exclusion and exclusion were two different things, we only have exclusion.

At the meeting the parents were told that using a deadname is classed as a hate crime in the school and as such treated the same as using racist language.

Schools don't get to decide what is a crime and what is not. Lawmakers do. If the school believes a crime was committed on their premises then presumably they reported it to the police. No?

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 29/06/2024 08:10

It's a long time since I had dealings with schools but I have the impression from MN and from various news reports that in many schools crimes are happening all the time - sexual assault, violent attacks, carrying a knife - and schools are not reporting them to the police. I would prefer both schools and the police to be concentrating on tackling real crimes of this sort.

BrendaSmall · 29/06/2024 08:10

TemporalMechanic · 26/06/2024 23:50

'Deadnaming' is a ridiculous word. Nobody died. This child changed their name. Your friend's DC referred to them by their previous name. I'm sure it happens all the time in schools when a teacher marries and changes their surname, or a child decides to start or stop going by a nickname.

If it was accidental, any disciplinary action would be absurdly punitive.
Deliberately calling someone a name you know they dislike could be bullying behaviour in which case a sanction could be warranted.

In either case the child who went by the previous name is in no way 'dead'. If Teddy thinks his name is babyish and wants to be Ted or Edward instead, that should be respected but it doesn't change the fact that he was once known as Teddy. Demanding others mentally rewrite reality to suit your self-perception is unhealthily controlling.

Thank you for your explanation, I couldn’t understand what it was all about by the original post 🤣
Never heard the term dead naming before