Just catching up with thread but refering back to Guardian comments.
I cant quite work out how long ago, but when it was relatively new for the Guardian to allow readers to comment on line. (15? 20? years)
Not sure about other sections, but anything about women / feminism was heavily censored - basically if a woman expressed an opinion that didn't tally with artilce it was deleted. This was long before the gender identity issue being written about. This was about basic feminist issues.
It was quite an eye opener for many women who just sort of assumed as the paper that first had a women's page that was a bit political (thank you Mary Stott#1 who must wondered what has happened to her intentions).
But any doubts that this was maybe about having women with a different analysis of feminist were quickly dismissed as the Guardian then appointed a man who often came on the comments to reprimand women for their thoughts (remind you of anyone) was then appointed to write articles about women / women's issuse. The sucess of the TRAs is because of the underlying much more deeply engrained MRAs that still openly exist.
I got banned for not toeing the line (I think it was 3 strikes and you are out) and still have an email account registered with them, but it is so long ago I cant actually access the email.
So the later dominance of Katherine Viner's committment to queer politics, and Own Jones being allowed to take precedence ove women journalists isn't a surprise.
It makes you suspect that many men on the left actually dont care about trans issues but out of spite align with it to have the "legitimate" position to tell women they are wrong. Their dreams come true.
#1 For anyone who doesn't know about Mary Stott here is a link to a R4 Great Lives series. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00xpp68 I didn't choose to link to obituaries in the Guardian because by then they were well and truely into "gender" and made it quite clear they had no idea about women's politics.