Some women have concerns that Sarah's case is not the best strategy and will entrench mixed sex provision.
I think it is totally disgusting that posters think they have the right to comment on a legal case bought by a survivor of rape as though what is more important is their views on it as a "campaign".
It is disgusting that anyone should think Sarah shouldn't have her day in court because of some fantasy someone has dreampt up that the outcome of this case would entrench mixed sex provision.
Talk about parasitic leaching on someone's distress.
If her legal team has had to decide on a particular line of arguement based on what the law says, than that is all they can do.
Instead of presuming to tell Sarah she shouldn't be doing what she is doing, for heavens sake have some empathy and let her do what is best for her and what her legal team has said is possible.
If you are actually worried about mixed sex provision getting "entrenched" start your own campaign, and do something, instead of sitting on the side line sniping.
Publicly criticising her at a time (unless they delay it again), when she is soon going to court is monstrous.
Just shocking.
(And for those who have been misled, Sarah's case has nothing to do with KJK or the clique of socialist feminist who are part of the WPUK -FiLia axis. This is about an individual woman looking for justice. It is more relevant what the local council is doing with its funding that any long term antipathy between 2 factions of feminism.)