KjK "insane rant" thread 2

[AdamRyan]

First thread filled up just as it was getting interesting

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5036512-kjks-insane-rant

So let's keep it going. My characterisation if the two basic positions are:

1)KJK is a stone cold legend, haters gonna hate but many women will give her cash to bathe in champagne

2. KJK is taking right wing positions for clicks and cash, most recently criticising a doctors conference to stay relevant.

Happy to discuss further. There are some particular posts I want to respond to which I will c&p below

Is the CPAC a safeguarding risk?

CPAC paid for her Australian flights, confirmed by the founder and National Director of CPAC Australia on ABC Radio.

I stand corrected in that case.

There are no words

Antifa is decentralised. It started in Europe tho, deffo not an American thing and not banned in the U.K.

https://www.filia.org.uk/latest-news/2021/7/5/helen-steel-responds-to-antifa-attack-on-womens-protest

By Helen Steel, who was involved in Anti Fascism in the U.K. before they turned on Feminists

Quick Antifa explainer:

https://www.livescience.com/what-is-antifa.html

How it looked when I was first involved in leftwing activism in the 90s:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/contemporary-european-history/article/abs/crossing-borders-antifascist-action-uk-and-transnational-antifascist-militancy-in-the-1990s/B111B8A84BDB4F8193B28BFEF11DF77A

by the same author (Nigel Copsey)
as the paper above, as I can’t find a non institute sign in

https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/understanding-21st-century-militant-anti-fascism/

Antifa is a hell of a lot less American than CPAC 😂

@OldCrone

Some of us don't actually care who funded her trip or who she votes for.

That's interesting. If (hypothetically) it turned out she was funded by fascists - Nazis - would you care then? Or as long as you get what you want, it's okay?

Are Nazis funding women’s rights activists then? or is this just some weird fantasy scenario?

‘hypothetical’ = not true, right?

Hypothetical = a theoretical scenario.

Why do you care?

so no Nazis are funding women’s rights activists then? It’s just something you thought up yourself?

this is hilarious.
I think I read on here, that when an argument had no logical facts the fall back position is to shout NAZIS very loud.
We've got a live one!

The idea of actual Nazis funding a women's rights activist as successful and as gobby as KJK is hilarious.

I see the Right as wet Tories=> harder-line Tories=> batshit Tories before we get anywhere near "The Far Right". Who, for the avoidance of doubt, I detest.

Nazis, absolutely famous for supporting women's rights. That whole Me Tarzan, you trad wife thing is just a schtick, honest.

Kirche, kuche und kinder... who came up with nifty slogan... I can't quite remember...

@OldCrone

Why do you care?

Because someone should.

No. Hypothetical scenarios are used to spark critical thinking. I apologise that you were unable to achieve that here.

Do you care equally as tp who is funding TRAs?

I don’t care about random scenarios that strangers on the internet make up.

@KellieJaysLapdog

I don’t care about random scenarios that strangers on the internet make up.

That's handy. You simply don't want to answer it.

I can answer it.

Nazis are not funding women’s rights activists but if aliens landed and made all 27 Nazis in the UK start funding KJK via a tithe I’d think it was hilarious.

Those Nazis must be extremely old by now.

I did not say Kellie-Jay Keen was being funded by Nazis.

This was HYPOTHETICAL.

Do we understand the meaning of this word?

I wanted to see how far someone could go before they might start losing your support.

TBH, most of you are coming across as naïve, disingenuous, deceptive or just wilfully blasé.

TBH, most of you are coming across as naïve, disingenuous, deceptive or just wilfully blasé.

Or, just amused at ridiculous and nonsensical thought experiments.