Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anyone work for one of the big 4 consultancies who celebrated international women's day with a man taking about coming out as transgender?

174 replies

realdays · 08/03/2024 21:34

I generally don't care to get that stressed about the transgender issue BUT this flabbergasted me. I actually found myself saying to the screen out load 'oh you have to be kidding!'

On what planet is that right!!! Can't say a word at work as it is very US centric and obviously they think that's fine.

OP posts:
Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:23

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 09/03/2024 11:04

You're right, they're not. But that's not what was happening on that thread.

You must've been reading a different thread from me then as all I could see was the majority of posters try to make sense of the 2/3 posters spouting the 'you are all transphobes' nonsense with examples, situations where women can be put in vulnerable situations having a man present, stating biological reality etc etc.

The personal attacks came from the TWAW brigade. I was called a dinosaur at one point for pointing out that gender isn't assigned by a doctor at birth, which one poster was struggling with. (I'm 42 sniff sniff).

You made some fairly personal comments to one of those posters as I recall.

It was very much a two-way street on that thread.

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:23

Blackcats7 · 09/03/2024 11:16

How can women ever stand up against this ridiculous situation when even talking about it is banned?
We are living under a dictatorship of a small minority and their misguided and misinformed supporters.

Talking about it isn't banned.

MNHQ just don't allow personal attacks and troll hunting.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 09/03/2024 11:24

*You made some fairly personal comments to one of those posters as I recall.

It was very much a two-way street on that thread.*

Such as?

It really wasn't.

ILikeDungs · 09/03/2024 11:26

Flickersy It really wasn't

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:28

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 09/03/2024 11:24

*You made some fairly personal comments to one of those posters as I recall.

It was very much a two-way street on that thread.*

Such as?

It really wasn't.

As I recall (and summarising), calling those posters stupid / foolish / naive and making barbed comments about their parenting and children's safety.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:30

I'm not suggesting we ignore that fact, but just that the core issue is that by pretending gender stereotypes or accepting in law the reactionary and regressive claim that gender constructs are innate, essential and immutable we are smashing to pieces not only scientific fact as a basis of law, but the entire premise that women's rights and equalities have been founded upon. Thereby opening the floodgates for a return to terrifying subjugation of women and girls (and little hope of progress to liberate women from oppressive regimes in other countries).

Yes I absolutely agree with that, but I also want to be able to say why I don't want them in women's spaces here in this country, which isn't about identity labels, it's about their male sex. I also want to educate more naive posters on the reality of what's being demanded.

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:30

ILikeDungs · 09/03/2024 11:26

Flickersy It really wasn't

Well one of the personal attacks against one of those two posters which I did report was (again, summarising from the quote in the email about the report since I won't repeat it word for word) "Yuk, a mother who is too thick to protect her daughter".

And that's just one of them.

But sure, it wasn't a two way street.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:32

Did you post on the thread yourself @Flickersy? I didn't see you but might have missed.

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:33

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:32

Did you post on the thread yourself @Flickersy? I didn't see you but might have missed.

I didn't, I was reading it but didn't get a chance to.

Blackcats7 · 09/03/2024 11:33

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:23

Talking about it isn't banned.

MNHQ just don't allow personal attacks and troll hunting.

I wasn’t specifically meaning mumsnet.
In general the preaching of Stonewall and those who buy into it has silenced women.
Even my local fb womens group is too frightened to have any sort of post that so much as touches on any the issues involved.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 09/03/2024 11:34

As I recall (and summarising), calling those posters stupid / foolish / naive and making barbed comments about their parenting and children's safety.

I'll correct you - I said generally I find it astonishing that there are grown adults walking about thinking gender is assigned by a doctor at birth and is biology not taught in schools anymore. It wasn't directed to any particular poster. More a musing.

I didn't make any mention, or barbed comments as you state, about parenting and child safety. At all. Maybe check your facts (the irony given that whole thread).

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:35

It wasn't directed to any particular poster. More a musing

Of course not.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:35

Calling people "naive" is a bit of a weak "personal attack", no? How fragile, in a way that isn't observed on any other topic.

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:36

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:35

Calling people "naive" is a bit of a weak "personal attack", no? How fragile, in a way that isn't observed on any other topic.

Not if it's part of a litany of other insults.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:37

Vexatious reporting of gender critical posters has always been an issue here, there have even been magazine articles where people have boasted about it. I imagine MNHQ were bombarded when people needed to finish for the night.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 09/03/2024 11:38

For the record I do think that anyone who denies biological reality and can't see how trans ideology presents safeguarding issues, can't see the problems it creates in prisons, sports, rape crisis centres to name a few, for women and children are pretty stupid. That's just my opinion.

PegasusReturns · 09/03/2024 11:38

Not big 4, but big tech co. We have a woman (a real one) coming in to talk to us next week (couldn’t fit it in yesterday 🙄) about inclusion.

just saw the intro comms not one single mention of “woman” or “women”.

I will be making a noise.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:40

People need to make their feelings heard any way they can. Anonymous staff surveys can be good for this.

BridasShieldWall · 09/03/2024 11:41

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:28

As I recall (and summarising), calling those posters stupid / foolish / naive and making barbed comments about their parenting and children's safety.

Posters on that thread were responding to one of the ‘beyond’ posters saying she was glad she didn’t know anyone in real life who thought like the other posters and that they weren’t near her children. A lot of the responses, not all but it’s hard to remember precisely, were pointing out the disadvantages to her children / daughters.

GrumpyPanda · 09/03/2024 11:43

@winterplumage
I think the way the discussions tend to turn to women's fear of there being predatory, violent males among transwomen is in fact counterproductive.

It's not just counterproductive, it's often due to deliberate strawmanning by the TRA side. Been seeing it a lot in German Self-ID discussions this past year. Proponents of Self-ID reduce women's objections to concerns about safety which they then triumphantly proceed to dismantle. Never mind women's right to privacy and dignity in communal showers and changing rooms. Never mind OUR right to define our own identity and not be reduced to fluffy pink ladybrain. Never mind the fact that replacing sex as a legal category with gender identity also drives a coach and horses through the government's constitutionally mandated obligation to work towards real equality of women.

RethinkingLife · 09/03/2024 11:43

Even my local fb womens group is too frightened to have any sort of post that so much as touches on any the issues involved.

I completely understand that.

And being silent about it doesn't stop it happening.

https://giphy.com/gifs/angry-mad-men-burn-this-place-down-l41m2aEgQwiYNQOIw

Angry Mad Men GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Discover & share this Angry GIF with everyone you know. GIPHY is how you search, share, discover, and create GIFs.

https://giphy.com/gifs/angry-mad-men-burn-this-place-down-l41m2aEgQwiYNQOIw

Flickersy · 09/03/2024 11:44

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:37

Vexatious reporting of gender critical posters has always been an issue here, there have even been magazine articles where people have boasted about it. I imagine MNHQ were bombarded when people needed to finish for the night.

If someone's going "eww, how thick are you" or outright calling someone a troll, it's not exactly vexatious reporting. It's kind of MN 101 - don't insult other posters and don't troll hunt.

It's interesting how some people seem to think flouting the rules should be ignored for the right people with the right views, and if they get deleted then obviously they're the wronged party.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:46

I wasn't referring to any specific post, @Flickersy. Just making a general comment. I expect some deletions were justified.

ChaToilLeam · 09/03/2024 11:47

One day to celebrate women. ONE BLOODY DAY. And it gets hijacked by the “stunning and brave” crew and their supporters.

I am absolutely sick of it. Sick to the back teeth.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2024 11:48

Proponents of Self-ID reduce women's objections to concerns about safety which they then triumphantly proceed to dismantle. Never mind women's right to privacy and dignity in communal showers and changing rooms.

I do agree with this and have always tried to challenge this narrative. It's harder to argue that women don't deserve privacy and dignity, because then it's clear that women don't matter and male feelings are more important. They can say the "risk" is negligible and doesn't justify "punishing" all the others.