Not only have you previously posted an article from someone who doesn’t even offer any evidence to counter the leaks just outright dismissal (Evan Urqhart) , you post this.
Did you even read the article that I posted to you where Urqhart posted about how they believed the Wi spa incident was a hoax? Did you? Did you read the abusive tweets that Urqhart posts? Urqhart could not write about consent as Urqhart has no concept of consent yet dismisses horrendous consent failures reported and understood to be a mere sample of consent failures as ‘teaching aids’. And by posting that fucked up article you have just confirmed what we already knew, YOU have no concept of consent and you most certainly don’t know even the basic safeguarding principles.
I would start thoroughly checking the authors of articles you are posting if I were you. Or if you actually wanted to be credible in any way.
And you don’t bother reading a thread before offering your ill informed and often harmful opinion. You then spread harmful misinformation and you do it because you lack the ability to critical evaluate original source information.
As for Read’s contribution. This thread has already offered up serious errors in their so called ‘debunking’. Including the fact that they don’t seem to be able to understand the very concepts they offer ‘debunking’ on. And they cannot seem to read the studies they offer to counter the evidence linked to in the report. I suggest again you read even just the fucking thread.
I asked you if you had read the report it self before commenting. You replied, not all, it is so long. I suspect what you meant is, I glanced at it but I didn’t read it properly at all.
Once again you have shown your contributions on this forum seem to be more about shaming women analysing and discussing situations that impact our lives directly and collectively than about contributing anything positive. I could be wrong. But that is how it appears.
You once assured me that you ‘fought’ for the best health care standards to be put in place for children and vulnerable people. Either you have let ideology significantly impair your judgement or you lied even then. Maybe you are lying to yourself as well as to others.
Any person who has not read that report and felt significant concern that even parts of it were correct is not someone who cares for the health of children. And certainly not without ideological framing, or I would say conditioning at this point.