Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Starmer: "trans-inclusive" conversion therapy ban, "modernise" the GRA, all hate crime to be aggravated offences as part of making every child "proud and confident"

982 replies

ResisterRex · 30/01/2024 10:26

Exclusive in Diva, following a reception at a LGBT+ Labour event in Parliament on 29 Jan:

https://diva-magazine.com/2024/01/29/exclusive-keir-starmer-lgbtqia-rights/

"“We’ll strengthen the law, so every category of hate crime is treated as an aggravated offence,” Starmer said. “We’ll cut NHS waiting lists for LGBT+ people waiting for urgent physical and mental health care. We’ll modernise the Gender Recognition Act. We’ll implement a full, trans-inclusive, ban on all forms of conversion therapy. We fully support the view that conversion therapy is psychologically damaging abuse.”

“We are committed to a decade of national renewal and will work with all the organisations in this room tonight so every child can feel proud and confident in who they are, to stand up for LGBT+ rights at home and abroad and to get Britain’s future back.”

The mention of children is unclear but must have a background to the full speech? LGBT Labour hasn't tweeted about it but others have. Rayner and Dodds also in attendance.

https://x.com/djrm94/status/1752057964767101041?s=46&t=WHoOZ_3Kv5G6-FyQuvE0LQ

https://x.com/stevenatkins/status/1752256944843162016?s=46&t=WHoOZZ_3Kv5G6-FyQuvE0LQ

x.com/anuox/status/1752094930074325420?s=46&t=WHoOZ_3Kv5G6-FyQuvE0LQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
duc748 · 01/02/2024 18:28

I see no indications Labour are planning to do anything differently; I think they are proposing to implement a policy the Tories have dilly dallyed on.

I think, for once, you're right! 😃Except I'd probably say, kicked into the long grass, rather than dilly-dallied. As long as that 'guidance' continues to bracket the T+ with the LGB, there's going to be a problem.

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 18:41

DeeLusional · 01/02/2024 17:46

"The government is of the view that talking conversion therapies will have the intention of changing a person’s sexual orientation or changing them to or from being transgender. These are the therapies we want to capture."

Yep, that's exactly what we feared. A 12 yo says "I am Trans". OF COURSE parents don't want that (well the sane ones don't) parents or Therapist says "Are you sure? Let's talk about this" BANG! That's Conversion Therapy, Parents and therapists convicted.

How does that work then? It says "to or from" trans. Therapists and parents can equally be convicted for child says I'm trans, BANG they are transitioned

I think they are suggesting what anyone sane would, which is that therapy with gender questioning people should only be done by qualified practitioners (so no church based nonsense) and should take a neutral approach based on patient needs (not pro or anti trans in this case).

It seems to be bordering on a conspiracy theory to suggest this is an elaborate trojan horse being used by Labour for the aim of transing children without their parents consent.

WaterHound · 01/02/2024 20:30

Anything other than affirmation is views as conversion therapy in TRA land. You keep ignoring this fact.

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 20:47

I think TRA land is as relevant to the real world as MRA land or flat-earther land so I'm not sure why you want me to consider what they think? They've blown it, the horse has bolted with Isla Bryson and Karen White, nothing is happening because TRAs say so.

MrGHardy · 01/02/2024 21:01

We are talking about the leader of Labour making 0.01% of the population a major priority to appear as if he is progressive and fighting for social justice.

And here you are claiming only the Tories talk about it. And somehow I am the funny one.

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 21:14

MrGHardy · 01/02/2024 21:01

We are talking about the leader of Labour making 0.01% of the population a major priority to appear as if he is progressive and fighting for social justice.

And here you are claiming only the Tories talk about it. And somehow I am the funny one.

Dearie me. That's quite some DARVO. He barely talks about it (unlike the Tories)

EasternStandard · 01/02/2024 21:17

MrGHardy · 01/02/2024 21:01

We are talking about the leader of Labour making 0.01% of the population a major priority to appear as if he is progressive and fighting for social justice.

And here you are claiming only the Tories talk about it. And somehow I am the funny one.

He talks to TRAs but otherwise it’s ’no one is talking about it’ when it comes to women

So he’s pretty shit really. Like many others, Lammy and co

Ignoring women is no great thing

MrGHardy · 01/02/2024 21:22

Do you know what DARVO means or have you seen it on here and thought you'll just throw it around? Humor me, where is the reversal? We can go into the others, but let's start with that one.

Winnading · 01/02/2024 21:34

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 21:18

https://www.ft.com/content/0832548c-3750-4500-82c2-455e6f92faa7

The Tories are deliberately using this issue to drive divide

Imagine at the probable end of tenure the torys find a thing to use as a stick to beat labour with.
And labour just keep refusing to listen to women or engage their brain cells to realise this is a vote loser.

And
It seems to be bordering on a conspiracy theory to suggest this is an elaborate trojan horse being used by Labour for the aim of transing children without their parents consent.

No idea if it's a conspiracy theory but L,G and B are saying the same as us 6 and our socks.
Are you going to go school them too?

ResisterRex · 01/02/2024 21:35

Well I'm convinced us wims got this one wrong Hmm

https://x.com/uklabour/status/1753078253202596012?s=46&t=WHoOZ_3Kv5G6-FyQuvE0LQ

OP posts:
Boiledbeetle · 01/02/2024 21:51

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 08:21

This is very true. Labour also haven't said they'll remove the benefits cap and for the life of me, I cannot understand why that doesn't enrage the Labour base.

Labour seem to have inspired such absolute, unqualified trust in some of their voters, that voters simply assume Labour will remove the benefits cap. I suppose Labour are coasting on brand recognition established by the policies of previous leaders.

Improving the lives of poor people is simply not a priority for the current crop of Labour front-benchers

Assuming that they need our votes, they've made it crystal clear that they'd rather not be in power than compromise on their trans policies. If they cared about working for the benefit of the wider public they wouldn't be willing to set that ultimatum.

Imagine for a moment that a non-resident father told his ex that he would only see his kids over the summer holidays if he was allowed to take them on holiday abroad with his girlfriend of a month, to stay with her parents that the children had never met. He would have made his priorities very clear when he set that ultimatum, surely?

Would anyone really expect that he'd ensure the children had a happy and safe time on holiday with him, when he didn't care enough about his children to want to see them if he couldn't get his way about the holiday? If he cared about doing his best by his children, he wouldn't have set such an ultimatum, would he? He'd want to spend time with them whatever, even if he couldn't go abroad with them. He'd care how much it would hurt his kids if he refused to see them for the entire summer holidays!

The kids might have a nice time on holiday, depending on what his girlfriend and girlfriend's parents are like. However, it would be foolish to expect their father to ensure it, because he would have already demonstrated how little he cared for his children's emotions.

Similarly, I might be economically better off under a Labour government, but there's no need to kid myself that the Labour party has any great commitment to making that happen.

And now I'm having flashbacks to 1979 and the enforced summer holiday with a man we saw twice a year if lucky. that year was a camping holiday with my dad's new girlfriend and her kids. Luckily his new girlfriend was nice! The one that came after not so much! My dad didn't care either way.

But I digress! You're right about Similarly, I might be economically better off under a Labour government, but there's no need to kid myself that the Labour party has any great commitment to making that happen.

And as Labour really don't have anything about them at the moment that makes me think they have women's interests at heart, and I don't see any policies or promises that would lead me to indicate that being in power would suddenly help them see the error of their ways, and I see nothing about their other policies that would have a dramatic effect on the daily lives of the majority of people and make their lives better than they currently are I'm having trouble finding any reason why I should push women under the bus just to get rid of the Tories.

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 21:52

So, the Labour Party is tweeting speeches from ex-conservative, ex Stonewall UK Iain Anderson.

Has Karen Ingala Smith been allowed to join the Labour party yet, or is she still persona non grata for running female-only domestic violence services?

ArabellaScott · 01/02/2024 21:54

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 21:52

So, the Labour Party is tweeting speeches from ex-conservative, ex Stonewall UK Iain Anderson.

Has Karen Ingala Smith been allowed to join the Labour party yet, or is she still persona non grata for running female-only domestic violence services?

That's okay, they don't need her because Jess Philips graciously reads out the list she compiles every year.

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 21:55

MrGHardy · 01/02/2024 21:01

We are talking about the leader of Labour making 0.01% of the population a major priority to appear as if he is progressive and fighting for social justice.

And here you are claiming only the Tories talk about it. And somehow I am the funny one.

We are talking about the leader of Labour making 0.01% of the population a major priority to appear as if he is progressive and fighting for social justice. [REVERSE VICTIM AND OFFENDER ie claim Laboyr are doing what the tories are doing]

And here you are claiming only the Tories talk about it [DENY]. And somehow I am the funny one [ATTACK in a p.a. way]

ArabellaScott · 01/02/2024 21:56

ResisterRex · 01/02/2024 21:35

It's Penfold! Imagine him popping up again.

RethinkingLife · 01/02/2024 21:57

ResisterRex · 01/02/2024 21:35

I was most of the way through before I realised that the staring eyes were supposed to be authentic.

I kept expecting it to switch to a Michael Spicer in a Room Next Door sketch.

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 21:57

Boiledbeetle

Hugs! Sorry to bring back unpleasantly vivid memories.

Boiledbeetle · 01/02/2024 22:00

ResisterRex · 01/02/2024 21:35

I really really tried, but after 19 seconds of him gurning I had too much ick going on I'm sorry I had to stop watching. That man makes my skin crawl.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 01/02/2024 22:01

That guy is such a gigantic arse.

Boiledbeetle · 01/02/2024 22:01

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 21:57

Boiledbeetle

Hugs! Sorry to bring back unpleasantly vivid memories.

To be fair I did have a knickerbockerglory on that holiday which I still have fond memories of! It was massive!

TheaBrandt · 01/02/2024 22:05

Kiers out of date the kids are going GC now. Dd aged 15 had pshe today on this they were shown a video about transition etc and she announced her view was girls need their own spaces end of. Men can do what they want but this is non negotiable. I have been educating her. Dd is one of the popular confident girls so was able to speak out. All the other girls agreed. Teacher said “I’m not allowed to give my view on this girls but Im so pleased with you all”.

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 01/02/2024 22:05

Here's the TL;DL(isten) of Anderson.

"Labour have plans for the economy <namedrops frontbenchers> and businesses will like all these plans. <smiles hugely> Next week Keir is hosting a massive knees-up of a conference for business-owners, and I'm going!"

ResisterRex · 01/02/2024 22:11

Jess Philips graciously reads out the list she compiles every year

Replete with her own additions

OP posts:
nothingcomestonothing · 01/02/2024 22:13

AdamRyan · 01/02/2024 20:47

I think TRA land is as relevant to the real world as MRA land or flat-earther land so I'm not sure why you want me to consider what they think? They've blown it, the horse has bolted with Isla Bryson and Karen White, nothing is happening because TRAs say so.

Are you on glue? 'nothing is happening because TRAs say so'? So the GRA, the farce at Edinburgh Rape Crisis, Annex B in the NHS, the BACP having their ethics reviewed by Sophie Grace Chappell, just off the top of my head .

Women are self excluding from rape support they need because of TRA led policy that allows males into refuges and support groups. Women in hospital are sharing bays with males with special feelings without their consent, because TRAs wrote the policy which mandates that, and staff are forced to gaslight patients who question it. Girls are self excluding from sports and school toilets because boys can take them over as long as the boys say the magic words, because schools are competing for rainbow flag awards instead of safeguarding children.

What ivory tower do you inhabit, to be able to say that TRAs are irrelevant to the real world? Your luxury beliefs are unimaginable to me.