Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Using sex-based pronouns instead of their preferred gender-ID pronouns

248 replies

DuesToTheDirt · 29/01/2024 21:34

Has anyone ever done this? What happened?

I mean for people you know in real life, not on the internet, and for adults not children.

I would love to do this, though I don't suppose I will. But I feel that by saying "she" to refer transwomen I am being forced into a lie, that I am agreeing to someone's delusion. I try to avoid using pronouns, but realistically that just results in either not talking about certain people (which is definitely one strategy!) or using really convoluted language. It's all very well being "kind" to people, but it's certainly not kind on me.

OP posts:
Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:37

MidnightSerenader · 30/01/2024 07:44

No, they definitely do not.

Transmen are invariably running from their sexuality - breast-binding or having mastectomies, downplaying their attractiveness, making themselves androgynous.

Whereas transwomen, do the exact opposite. Long hair, pink, dresses, fake breasts, make-up - they’re all embraced - and all apparently make you a ‘woman’, whereas XX chromosomes, and a uterus definitely do not.

It’s incredible that we lump these two groups of people together.

Absolutely mind-boggling.

Hmmm ... First off looking androgynous is not unattractive. Lots of people look androgynous and are stunning. Women aren't obligated to dress a certain way.

The model below is a great example of androgyny.

My partner is frankly gorgeous. People hit on him all the time often having no clue he's trans. He's just a good looking guy. He was also a good looking butch lesbian. He's certainly not downplayed his looks. Either way he's attractive. To be honest it's kinda annoying. 😉

Using sex-based pronouns instead of their preferred gender-ID pronouns
Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:40

garlictwist · 30/01/2024 15:16

I am the OP for this comment. I said the person was a trans man but actually I don't know as I have not had that conversation. All I know is the person is a biological female who uses a male first name (that is never a woman's name) and wears a suit. So I am assuming they are trans and/or don't want to be known as she/her. Maybe I'm wildly wrong. "They" seems safer. It's a minefield.

Gotcha! In that case "they" is a safe bet. You sound very kind at any rate and I'm sure they appreciate that. 💞

Not all trans or nonbinary people get bad if you make a mistake. The ones I know are very chill. I suspect most are they just fly under the radar.

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:44

SaffronSpice · 30/01/2024 15:37

So you ARE consenting to the harms to women I outlined. You have no objection to the harms caused. You prioritise this males wants above the rights of women.

That's a very black and white view of the world.
Why do you think this?

Trans people have been around for years. Many don't want any of the things you say. Some are quite vocal and have a huge platform and are speaking out in support of women's rights.

MirrorMirror1247 · 30/01/2024 15:56

SaffronSpice · 30/01/2024 15:37

So you ARE consenting to the harms to women I outlined. You have no objection to the harms caused. You prioritise this males wants above the rights of women.

Look, I know there are lots of things to consider regarding the potential effect of the trans community on all the issues you mentioned, and no doubt more besides. I'm not going to go into all of that on here, not because I don't have opinions on them, but because it would take too long. Someone asked the question about which pronouns others would use to address trans people, and I answered based on my own thoughts and feelings. That's it. Frankly, I don't care if anyone disagrees with me referring to my relative as female. I'll continue to do it because that's what she wants.

SaffronSpice · 30/01/2024 15:57

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:44

That's a very black and white view of the world.
Why do you think this?

Trans people have been around for years. Many don't want any of the things you say. Some are quite vocal and have a huge platform and are speaking out in support of women's rights.

Care to name those with a huge platform speaking out in support of women’s rights?

viridiano · 30/01/2024 16:04

No, I wouldn't deliberately use a certain pronoun for someone who has clearly told me that they want me to use a different one. I think that's rude.

I might make a mistake or forget sometimes, but I would do my best to refer to them as they prefer.

JohnMytton · 30/01/2024 16:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SaffronSpice · 30/01/2024 16:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SaffronSpice · 30/01/2024 16:22

MN Debbie Hayton is quite upfront about being an AGP. He also uses ‘He’. And he wrote schools guidance which clearly says children and staff should behave in ways which validates what he now admits is AGP. He also stated in a recent newspaper article that he wished he could use the women's like he used to. As an AGP he admits himself to be. So why delete?

Are we now not allowed to outline how women have been harmed by gender ideology?

JellySaurus · 30/01/2024 16:51

If he identifies as a transman, then yes those are his pronouns.

What gives you the right to assign anybody's pronouns? Pronouns are what the individual wants them to be. They are not dictated by a person's label or presentation.
<eyeroll>

Do you know any transmen who want to be referred to as they or she?

Yes. I know females who identify as transmen and want to be called they/them. I also know one who requires neopronouns. <likewise eyeroll>

JellySaurus · 30/01/2024 16:59

You can accept someone as a trans person while still wanting the above to be respected.

You can accept someone as a trans person without taking on for yourself the role of support person. I will no more validate a trans person's identity belief than I will validate a Christian's religious belief.

Amazing how I manage to have Christian friends without them insisting that I convert to their faith, nor requiring me to mouth platitudes that make it look like I believe what they believe.

WickedSerious · 30/01/2024 17:11

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:02

Most trans people know they are not biologically women or men. My trans partner is well aware he is trans. I don't believe he is a biological man nor does he.

I feel like the loudest voices on either side are the ones that get attention and media rather than the majority just living a regular life. At that a small tiny percentage of the population.

Of course there are assholes who are trans, just like their are terrible biological men and women.

You know she's not a bloke,she knows she's not a bloke but you both pretend that she's a bloke?

MidnightSerenader · 30/01/2024 17:27

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 15:44

That's a very black and white view of the world.
Why do you think this?

Trans people have been around for years. Many don't want any of the things you say. Some are quite vocal and have a huge platform and are speaking out in support of women's rights.

Some are quite vocal and have a huge platform and are speaking out in support of women's rights.

Can you provide some names of transwomen doing this, please?

TempestTost · 30/01/2024 17:51

TheodoreMortlock · 30/01/2024 10:32

@TempestTost wasn't the heresy of the Gnostics that there was a second, lesser god? A sort of substitute teacher god for the material world?

I thought mortification of the flesh for the good of the soul was a pretty standard Catholic thing especially in medieval times. But I may well be wrong!

The Gnostics were dualists, so they thought there was the good god, who created the soul, and the bad god, who created the material world, including bodies that imprisoned souls. When people die, they leave the body behind and exist properly as a pure soul. Gnostics and other dualists tend to do some extreme mortifications.

In Christianity, the body and soul for a proper unity, and both are good. After dearth the body and soul are temporarily separated, which is an unnatural state - we aren't really ourselves without our bodies. This is seen as an effect of the Fall, because we are no longer in unity with God, the source of life. After the end of the world we are meant to be reunited with our bodies which are supposed to be transformed and regain their incorruptible nature through the mediation of Christ who regenerates that connection between the divine life and the body.

Mortification of the flesh can happen in Christian practice though it's conceived a little differently, it's usually seen as a way to help manage the appetites. Since the body is in itself good, it isn't supposed to go too far, though what that would include has been interpreted differently at different times. In a lot of cases it's Protestantism in the early modern period where things go a little crazy on that front.. It tends to be much more skeptical about the body than Catholicism.

YouJustDoYou · 30/01/2024 17:54

Rightsraptor · 30/01/2024 00:57

Just don't talk about them. If they're so emotionally fragile, they'll probably be glad of it.

This is the rule of thumb I follow. Don't talk to them, don't interact with them, don't talk about them, and therefore there won't be a shit storm if you accidentally get it wrong/refuse to lie.

YouJustDoYou · 30/01/2024 17:54

MidnightSerenader · 30/01/2024 17:27

Some are quite vocal and have a huge platform and are speaking out in support of women's rights.

Can you provide some names of transwomen doing this, please?

Blaire White

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 30/01/2024 18:37

Balloonhearts · 30/01/2024 08:43

Result!

😂It’s actually rather complicated and I wish it was different.

Messyhair321 · 30/01/2024 18:55

Helleofabore · 30/01/2024 10:04

You do?

I don't personally know anyone who identifies with these things however actually it really wouldn't bother me if I did & they wanted to identify as such. I don't see the issue personally speaking: & certainly wouldn't impose my own views on someone who identifies as whatever they want. It's not my story & why would my view trump theirs, it's their life isn't it? Not mine. It's not costing me anything to use their chosen pronoun or whatever.
I feel like it's the very least of our problems as a human race.

Messyhair321 · 30/01/2024 19:08

Boiledbeetle · 30/01/2024 10:17

In that case...

If it doesn't hurt anyone or offend why do it? I mean it cost nothing to be respectful

why go out of your way to tell someone off for using a pronoun that you don't like

And how does this hurt you? FFS

Emm because it's their choice, their life, you do realise that just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean that your right trumps the individual who you are disrespecting.
And don't keep trying to turn it around it's not fresh. Not sure why you believe that your view is more important than the individual who has free choice to call themselves what they like. I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate being called by the wrong name or wrong pronoun.

Helleofabore · 30/01/2024 19:08

Messyhair321 · 30/01/2024 18:55

I don't personally know anyone who identifies with these things however actually it really wouldn't bother me if I did & they wanted to identify as such. I don't see the issue personally speaking: & certainly wouldn't impose my own views on someone who identifies as whatever they want. It's not my story & why would my view trump theirs, it's their life isn't it? Not mine. It's not costing me anything to use their chosen pronoun or whatever.
I feel like it's the very least of our problems as a human race.

yes. I gathered that you would affirm any identity. Even someone who identified as a lizard or a snake.

if you cannot see the significance in affirming such an identity, I doubt anyone will convince you of the harm you cause through doing so.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 30/01/2024 19:12

I don’t relate to anyone on the basis of just what they tell me about themselves. I relate to them on the basis of what I observe, in terms of their behaviour. So if someone tells me that I must use certain words about them, that’s a bit of a warning. The terms of healthy relationships aren’t dictated by one person to the other.

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 19:12

Blair White
Kalvin Garrah (trans man)
Theyrn Meyer testified on behalf of Jordon Peterson
Lady Maga (drag queen)

That said at some point they've all been attacked by both sides.

Blair has dealt with women yelling at her when she's literally agreeing with them, and trans activists who call her transphobic.

Messyhair321 · 30/01/2024 19:16

Helleofabore · 30/01/2024 19:08

yes. I gathered that you would affirm any identity. Even someone who identified as a lizard or a snake.

if you cannot see the significance in affirming such an identity, I doubt anyone will convince you of the harm you cause through doing so.

No they won't. I feel like it's the very least of our issues as a human race to be honest it's petty, self protective & ridiculous. I know you disagree & that's ok. We can disagree

Josette77 · 30/01/2024 19:18

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 30/01/2024 19:12

I don’t relate to anyone on the basis of just what they tell me about themselves. I relate to them on the basis of what I observe, in terms of their behaviour. So if someone tells me that I must use certain words about them, that’s a bit of a warning. The terms of healthy relationships aren’t dictated by one person to the other.

This is interesting to me.
If I present female and introduce myself as Josette, am I telling you to use certain words?

Do you make exceptions to trans people who pass? If you met Lisa who looks like a woman and you only know she's trans because she's told you, do you immediately refer to her as a man now?

And if people who pass get treated better how do we dissuade young people from early transition?

Messyhair321 · 30/01/2024 19:20

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 30/01/2024 19:12

I don’t relate to anyone on the basis of just what they tell me about themselves. I relate to them on the basis of what I observe, in terms of their behaviour. So if someone tells me that I must use certain words about them, that’s a bit of a warning. The terms of healthy relationships aren’t dictated by one person to the other.

Oh really? So if I said my name is Tracy & to you I just didn't look like a Tracy, you'd just plainly refuse & call me something else. Ok.
Strangely judgemental in a backhanded way

Swipe left for the next trending thread