And again we cycle around.
Your position has been unworkable from the get go. It is the position, having these male people now wedged into the word woman, that has caused the harm we are seeing now. This has been explained to you in different ways in this thread.
You have failed to grasp that you are the person here who is the ‘nutter’ you keep accusing everyone else of. Because you are ignorant.
You admit it. Yet, You think we all are too, so you say. Whereas, many of us have read widely and have listened to law experts debate this topic. We have done a huge amount of what could be constituted as research. Some people who post on the threads of FWR are experts though, many are not. But as ignorant as you? No. Because we are not the ones throwing around the slurs and misinformation.
You are.
However, your position is unworkable. So many of us have taken the time to point out the flaws of your posts and you just ignore it all.
Because there is NO RIGOROUS TEST!
You are talking about a diagnosis tool that doesn’t exist. There was always misdiagnosis being given. Even 20 years ago. Less misdiagnosis, I grant you. But there was still misdiagnosis.
Now there is no diagnosis needed at all.
Still, there is absolutely fucking NO magic diagnosis. Therefore gender is not a solid basis that laws should be made on. It is fluid. Even unintentionally. It is this fluidity that shows it is not innate.
If a male transitions after your magic test, and has hormones and surgery, but then detransitions, how will anyone know he has detransitioned again? With that historical diagnosis, he is still able to access female single sex spaces. But feels male so will probably use male facilities. And female designated job roles.
And is he now magically protected by all laws for adults, including those of female and male, by nature of him magically having this diagnosis done by rigorous testing once, but now detransitioning. But that diagnosis is still in place not removed. Or, are you stating that it is not a permanent state? How does that then work? Has this male individual now become a Philip Bunce or Eddy Izzard? Which day do we allow them in? Or have you bigotedly now defined transgender for transgender people and declared fluidity to be non-existent?
Are you getting it yet?
Or did this trans male individual get ‘cured’. yet may have breasts and may have an inverted penis to recreate a vagina. So what sex category legally does he belong in under your proposal?
Under your category, he is a ‘woman’ still. Or has is it a temporary diagnosis and transient? Like an illness not a condition. Is that what you are saying? And if the diagnosis can be changed, how often?
What about that man retransitioning because it was too hard to now live with the neo vagina and breasts as a man? What happens then if this trans person gets dementia. And is a man in their mind again. But is treated like a woman?
Again, your laws mean that this person will be treated as female, on a female dementia ward but he is living again as a very distressed man. Now in a body that he doesn’t recognise as his own. He has yet another layer of body dysphoria.
But he shouldn’t have ever been treated as if he was a female person under law. He should never have been allowed into female single sex spaces designed for not just safety, but privacy and dignity. As your solution has actively allowed. As had the current laws until slowly, slowly, those bigots and nutters you describe have started to pull apart those laws to expose their conflicting nature. And to start protecting women and children again through law cases, through guidance and through getting laws modified from that position that your solution allows.
You describe ‘case by case’ as a solution but you have not once articulated how that works to protect women and children. You simply keep doubling down saying that it is the right approach and that people pointing out you are wrong are bigots and extreme. ‘Nutters’.. All the while showing you haven’t thought this through, you are operating at a level of superficiality that has already proven harmful and dangerous.
And on the name calling point, you have been the poster here using the derisory, derogatory language of the ignorant. Hermaphrodites, bigots and nutters. You seem to be only here to sneer and name call. You equate women who have a depth of knowledge that far outstrips yours as akin to Bible Belt evangelists.
Which is hypocritical considering what you have posted and the lack of any depth of explanation therein. Your posts display that said evangelical style belief that you accuse others of. All centred around this case by case basis, based on rigorous testing. And propped up with the belief that you are the righteous one.