Eddie Izzard - "these arguments will drift away".

[HootyMcBooby76]

Eddie Izzard criticises discord sown between trans and women's rights: 'They shouldn't be fought against each other' | Watch (msn.com)

Another interview with Izzard saying these "arguments will drift away", it's "live and let live", its a right wing ideology etc.

Get fucked Eddie.
Women's rights will not just "drift away" you moron.

It's NOTHING to to with homophobia, the arguments aren't even comparable.
You just want women to shut up and sweep themselves out of the room and close the door after themselves, don't you?

Well, it's not happening you twat.

Drift away Eddie, to the far side of fuck. And when you get there fucking drift away some fucking more.

I wish Eddie would drift away.

Drift away into irrelevance , old Izzard of Was.
I absolutely love this, thanks for making me laugh 😂🤩

Eddie Izzard is an utter prick

I don't see why Eddie Izzard thinks he has any more right than any other bloke to decide about women's rights. Putting nail varnish and lipstick on occasionally doesn't make him some sort of expert or decision maker.

Eddie is a misogynist - a haiku

So, a man proclaims
'Arguments will drift away'.
Do fuck off you twat.

Points to you for 'ghastly misogynist' - love it!

Ha at these responses

He’s a menace

But it won't will it?

Gay rights don't impinge on how women are made to feel. They evaporated because most people realise someone's sexuality has nothing to do with them.

The resentment girls and women will feel by being coerced to share their spaces with hulking great big strange men will only grow and grow.

No, that was a different rally to the one pictured. What I thought was telling, though, was the expression on the woman's (in the hijab) face.

Exactly.

Gay rights did not rely upon taking AWAY the rights of a whole other group of people. It did not affect other men or women.

Trans "rights" rely SOLELY on taking away the rights of other people. The two cannot co-exist (in the way that Eddie and the TRAs seem to demand) without one party (namely women) being disadvantaged.

As for apologizing in 10 years time?

There are no swear words that are strong enough to tell Eddie and his little sycophantic mate where to go and what to do when they get there.

It is certainly a bloke - as is apparent to anyone who has seen it; but no, the sex segregated rally was elsewhere. What was of interest, I thought, was the woman's expression.

Well, at least when people see the trailer for Izzard’s new Dr Jekyll film they certainly will drift away. In droves.

Genius. I've never got the hang of Haikus but this is a template!

It's been reviewed in the Spectator 😬

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/basic-plodding-and-lacking-any-actual-horror-doctor-jekyll-reviewed/

I used to watch the Hammer horror double bill with my sister, a bottle of Geebee lemonade and a bag of crisps each when our parents went to the British Legion*. This....addition makes me sad.

*We were only kids MN would have conniptions.

And the Guardian 😬😬

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/oct/26/doctor-jekyll-review-eddie-izzard-in-gender-flipped-reboot-of-hammer-horror

The Telegraph 😶

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2023/10/26/doctor-jekyll-review-eddie-izzard/

https://archive.ph/TzFWe archive link

Although the review itself I found quite amusing for some reason. By wasted, do you think they meant drunk?

I just watched the trailer. Will be giving that one a swerve.

It looks like a dreadful vanity exercise.

Perhaps his girl mode was using his boy mode as a mouth piece?

I Wonder why that would be 🤔

Women’s rights are human rights. You already have a gents’ bog marked out for you, Eddie, so please drift away in that direction - many thanks.

The funny thing is that most people are going to see him as a "trans" villain. He's obviously male.

How long before someone starts complaining that the negative reviews are "transphobic", do we think?

Ah to have the confidence of a mediocre white man!