I am a creature of the Left, too, though I have kindly been called a "pragmatist" by more "ideologically pure" friends farther Left than me.
I support a healthy welfare state, laws to support collective bargaining. Class is the principle mechanism of oppression in this country, and laws for redistribution of wealth should be welcomed to moderate the extremes of welath inequality. But I also believe people need to he protected from the state because no institution can be trusted completely. I think that fewer laws are better than more, because the state should intrude as little as possible and also because people need to know the laws that govern them.
I believe a strong sense of civic identity is beneficial, and a melting-pot approach to integration is better than a multi-cultural one - people are happier when they are united rather than divided.
So a bit of a mixed-bag, ideologically. Each problem has its own solution which shouldn't be bound by one ideology.
I do not, however, support the "theory" side of the modern left, the breaking down of boundaries, the identity politics, the postmodernism, the lack of personal responsibility but the extreme elevation of individual expression at the expense of society. Equity is monstrous, equality and non-discrimination should be the goal, and anyone who suggests that the solution to past discrimination is more discrimination is either an idiot or someone who will benefit from the new unequal society. Even some of the more radical feminist thought leaves me cold.
But I'm gender critical. Sex should matter only where it has a material impact on one's ability to do a job. However I don't mind sexed language, I think it has utility and more expressiveness in language guves you the opportunity to impart more information and is a good thing. But there are plenty of situations where it isn't necessary.