What is this "need" to talk positively about groups of people, just based on their simple label or ID or category?
We don't go "footy fans, they're lovely" or "saxophonists, they're great" or "gardeners, they're the best".
I totally refute this modern day need to big up groups of people, just because.
No, we talk about the character of individuals, actions, nothing beyond that.
So, in an alternate dimension, trans people would exist, in the grand tradition of Billy Elliott there'd be no judging gender non conforming behaviour, there'd be live and let live, there'd be help for those with issues, and support for those working at being good citizens.
And of course, actions would be judged. How many invaded women's spaces and sport. How much teen medicalisation was pushed. How much free speech was compromised.
In this alternate dimension where women and free speech weren't stepped on, and children were free of the spectre of infertility and osteoporosis, we'd be supportive, but still no need to big up the group.
But in the world we all live in, where negative outcomes in my criteria are now escalating, to say that there's any compunction to speak boostingly and soothingly of trans is preposterous. Even with no controversy, this shouldn't be needed. With society riven with schisms because of unreasonable demands and no compromise accepted, it's amazing there isn't more slamming from the rest of us, and society at large.