Didn't the Cass report conclude that social transition was the single biggest indicator of subsequent medical transition?
If not the Cass report, it was some other report.
Given that children are targeted and taught how to alienate their parents if they disagree with social transition, leaving it up to parents seems incredibly foolhardy.
And likening it to section 28 is straight out of the TRA Load of Old Bollocks Playbook.
I wish the government would provides some bloody clarity as to what they think transitioning actually is. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation. Is it a medical condition? A metal health issue?
How can parents, at the behest of their children, direct schools to accommodate a medical issue, that is not diagnosed? And where is the evidence that accommodating it in this way is beneficial?
And What difference does it make if it's in the equality act?
Can people self identify as disabled, just because it's in the equality act?
It's a mess. Switching from a civil rights issue to a medical one, to a mental health one, and back again, at breakneck speed.