Just of curiosity, why are you here?
On a board dedicated to feminism and women's rights?
There's a perennial problem when women complain of sexually-unwanted conduct perpetrated against them by the establishment, or by men in general. This is the more-or-less default position of challenging that woman's integrity before they even begin to question the males' behaviour.
Rather than believe what the crime statistics tell them, or the general pattern #MeToo illustrates, there is a stubborn, socially ingrained misbelief - given to rugsweeping or outright denial - that men could possibly be the perpetrators of such crimes. Conversly, society is far more comfortable with the assumption that it must be women who are liars.
This is aside from the unassailable statistical evidence that the overwhelming majority of sex offenders are male. Still, it's women who are to blame and they must be punished twice - firstly by the indignity of being assaulted in the first place and secondly by the legal system which will pull out all the stops to make her unenviable experience her own fault. As for the police, the measure of someone's present behaviour is what they've done in the past. And institutionally, their present record is woeful.
Why do people do this? Why default to the position that any woman who dares assert her own boundaries and or preserve her bodily automy, having (allegedly) had this violated, is a liar?
I believe the phrase given to this is 'persistence in the face of all evidence to the contrary'.