But we have regular MN posters representing TQ+ activism who regularly post on the threads to explain that:
a female stating reality is a justification for violence from a MRA as she is being provocative (recent thread)
a female stating reality is absolutely as bad as, for example an MRA punching a female so hard he fractures her skull
really this is a belief system that follows the ancient tradition that sometimes a woman just needs a good slap.
These posters tend to be as baffled by objections to this as they are to the resistance towards their theory that what a lesbian really needs in their life is cock and they'll reframe their sexuality once they've had some, and that women can be fully and properly defined by men who understand life and the contents of the woman's head much better than any woman, and women should gratefully receive these definitions and labels instead of, for example, saying 'do not call me cis'. It is the exact same paternalism of the 'nice' old school TS MNetters who came here years ago to say gently and firmly, "I've listened to all your reasons why you want single sex spaces, and my managerial decision is that they are not important (to me) and the greater good is served by me doing what I want regardless'.
This view of women is not a bug, it is a feature. It has always been a feature. You cannot take the misogyny and violence out of this movement, or pretend it's something other, or a capture by extremists, all you can do is work out for yourself at what shade you become uncomfortable enough with it to say 'no' to a male.