@Brumbrumbrumbrummie It depends on what they deem 'hate crimes'. To trans people, especially in the UK, a woman saying NO to an obviously male person with a male appendage in womens biological sex-based spaces is considered 'hate'. A woman complaining about an obviously male person with a male appendage on the British swimming team or other womens sports is classified as 'hate'.
Yet the reverse, women being violated and stripped of their rights to fair play, and rights to safety, dignity and privacy aren't classified as 'hate'. I wonder why that is? Because men run the world.
There has been a decrease in actual hate against trans people; they are protected species. They are the MOST powerful lobby there is. There has, however, been an increase in hate against women; violent hate speech ie RAPE threats and death threats, hate speech against women as a sex class, and violence against women at womens rallies (men charging at women, pushing them, removing flags and signs from them and in NZ, a 72 year old woman had her eye socket fractured when a trans activist sucker-punched her right in the eye).
Women don't go up hitting big tall men in dresses. We know we don't stand a chance against men. Women aren't the ones assaulting or threatening rape "until your uterus ruptures" or "all t*rfs should be raped until they die". It's male trans activists and trans women (males) who are, so your DARVO and gaslighting is quite insulting.
It's just that women don't report these incidents. Where as a brave man in a dress attempting to play the victim, does. If women reported these incidents, it would be as many as (as a recent Scottish survey showed) 96% (yes, ninety-six) of women have been subject to hate speech and/or assault.