I'm sorry you went through that.
Sadly I feel that the many armchair psychologists on here aren't open to consideration of any data that challenges their established view. They'll lambast me for not linking a study but then confidently state that 'it's all about male entitlement' without providing any source of their own.
Like all the posters on here that refuse to even consider that testosterone likely influences male violence despite reams of studies indicating that it almost certainly does - e.g. higher levels causing an increased fight/flight response in the brain and it also making women more violent as well as the vast majority of male mammals.
These people would rather blame 'men' as a whole but this approach (despite giving them ammunition for their constant diatribes) actually does a disservice to the victims because it creates an unresolvable problem by shifting the blame away from the perpetrators onto a massive group who are mostly innocent.
It's like trying to tackle littering in the local park by moaning to the residents rather than catching and fining the fuckers who do it. Most people will react with a "well, I'm not to blame" if accused of something they aren't actually doing themselves.
A better approach would be focusing on our sons and the men we can actually influence rather than trying to lecture men in general.
It seems logical to me that if suicide is the main cause of death in men <50 then a lot of men must be depressed. If depressed men are 3x more likely to commit violent crime we will probably see significantly more violent crime than if these men were able to receive the help they need.
Happy to discuss but won't be replying to any posters telling me I 'should be ashamed of myself'. For me this is about finding a solution rather than just revelling in another opportunity to moan about male entitlement, using the death of women and children as a vehicle to do this.