What's mind boggling about the lack of logic is that tattoos are illegal until you're 18, drinking alcohol is illegal until 21 in the USA (18 here), getting married is illegal, in California they've just said children can't use tanning salons, driving illegal for children etc (even though many are big enough by about 13) - so all of these things are illegal for children because they're deemed incapable of good decisions and can't weigh benefit and risk. But cutting off healthy body parts, removing function for life, and taking experimental, extremely strong drugs with known lifelong side effects, apparently fine.
Society has lost its collective mind on this one issue alone.
The people supporting this would have absolutely been supporting lobotomising kids if it were a different time.
I do think there's a wider agenda at play to make it seem children can consent to things they quite blatantly can't really consent to. Child safeguarding is at risk.
This poor, poor girl, I hope she has a very good team of people supporting her. I don't know how you ever recover from such mutilation by adults who should know better.
And yes, so many whistleblowers coming forward saying that the counselling children receive is actually affirmation and is almost indoctrination - telling children there is only one solution to their problems (involving getting healthy body parts removed), with alternative options such as watchful waiting never explored.