Yep, this thread has noticeably brought them out of the woodwork.
As for the derogatory term used to describe trans people, I've never even heard of it.
I'd point out that TERF is a derogatory term too. And as for 'bleeder ..., or reducing even the words 'woman' and 'feminism' to taboo, dirty words, it's very clear what's driving that particular agenda. Under the guise of protecting one small group of people, there's a fully-armed attack mode being deployed against the only majority that has ever been treated as a minority.
To pick up on a further point upthread, I couldn't give a monkey's if CF is not a feminist, or whether or not all her views happen to chime with mine. She's a woman, and she's being persecuted by aggressive MRAs. We need to choose which issue is currently more urgent. The UK isn't the USA; our right-wing politics are not the same as the US alt right (which the lacking-in-nuance TRAs are constantly and wrongly trying to align with UK feminists. More forced teaming, as if they hadn't got through with LGBT). In Europe, despite the fiasco that is Brexit, issues like capital punishment and denial of the right to abortion are not coming back. They are no longer part of the fabric of our politics - those days are gone.
The assault against free speech and erasure of women are the most serious and urgent issues - not just feminist issues but fundamental human rights ones - I've ever witnessed during my lifetime. To me there are clear ethical choices to make, and these are not comfortable if you happen to stand on the pro-quality rather than pro-quantity side of the 'life' debate. But it's a case of deciding which, in the UK's specific current circumstances, are the most pressing.
For me there is no question. Today it's CF, JKR and Stock. Tomorrow it could be any of us. What's happening to CF is unconscionable: there can be no reason or excuse for it, particularly when it's very evident whose specific vendetta has made her the target.