‘he’s not an arsehole!’
I said that - or at least something like ‘I don’t think he’s an arsehole’.
My reason being, I haven’t been scrutinising him, though I heard a lot of predigested opinions, as though I was supposed to think he was an arsehole. My personal belief is that it would be hard to find a billionaire who isn’t thought to be an arsehole. There’s nothing like success to get all the mean-spirited, judgemental gossips crawling out of the woodwork looking for dirt to dish. So much easier to complain about what other people are doing instead of doing something yourself.
I hugely appreciate what he’s done for Twitter and insodoing, done for the world, done for democracy and done for free speech. At first, I was suspicious (after all - isn’t this guy supposed to be an irredeemable arsehole?), and I was so delighted that he took the risk, taking a huge financial hit for himself and his investors, for purely ethical reasons. He knew there was something within his power to do and he did it.
I also appreciate that he wants to help AI from being a threat to humanity.
Anyway, someone who does something ethical, of great benefit to the world and at a personal cost, to me, makes them not an arsehole in my opinion.
I would love to have some bot to trawl through all the personal decisions his haters have made, get them all up in the dock, put them on trial, and we can decide whether they are arseholes or not. I wonder how many would be found guilty?