Honest to goodness, we'd be here all night, well...year, going into it and you still wouldn't have any consideration for the points that I would make. So I really don't see the point.
But if you can't acknowledge that the scientific community, in general (not exclusively, I agree, there are a minority still hanging on to a binary interpretation) are engaged in a broader understanding of sex over a reductive binary model then I think you've got your head in the sand and you're deliberately avoiding / refusing to acknowledge the discourse in this area.