I mean. I remember first encountering Marg on the threads discussing prostitution and thinking there was some very disconnected thinking.
But if someone (general) is so deeply entrenched in ‘sex work is work’, it is only natural I guess that you dismiss violence against women or cannot recognise it.
And it also then fits that you (general you) are always ready to dehumanise people who you don’t agree with. An example would be to keep referring to them as ‘gender criticals’ as Marg does. Wherebgrammatically it should be ‘the gender criticals’ and a symmetrical examples would be ‘the transes’. Not something used by regular uses and would rightly be deleted. They are both examples of dehumanising groups of people. And the outcome is to dehumanise groups to allow violence to be acceptable towards that group.
The difference is that I doubt any regular feminist poster would find violence towards trans people, even protestors, acceptable to be dismissed.
So of course it makes sense that you (general you) would also then persist in not reecognising violent threats from males some with a history of mistreatment of women in various degrees. While contorting the meaning of a dramatic statement by Kellie Jay to aggressively counter arguments or to ignore the arguments and keep on doing what she is doing.
It seems to fit a consistent profile with a particular thread that looks like hatred of women that becomes clear when put it together. That must be very hard to acknowledge if it is at all acknowledged by anyone who has got to that point. I think some people do get to that point though.
So therefore the people who show that hatred up, the feminists including posters on FWR, must be diminished and reduced in stature in those people’s minds.