Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'Breaking' - Transgender rapist won’t be imprisoned in Scotland’s all-women jail, Nicola Sturgeon tells MSPs

648 replies

zaramysaviour · 26/01/2023 12:53

Excellent news.

And Sturgeon has really shot herself in the foot here (again). Because if she really thinks 'trans women are women', why is she not allowing this 'woman' to go to a female prison?

So therefore she knows this person is not a woman.

So therefore she is being transphobic...

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
midgetastic · 26/01/2023 18:50

The default was womens jail
The outrage made that untenable
But it should never have been a question

Boiledbeetle · 26/01/2023 18:52

FactsAreNotMean · 26/01/2023 18:49

That photo is the gift which keeps on giving; the photographer definitely understood the assignment!

Has it actually been confirmed what impact GRC has on prison choice - with a GRC would he be in the women's wing regardless?

Which photo? This photo? Or this photo?😶

'Breaking' - Transgender rapist won’t be imprisoned in Scotland’s all-women jail, Nicola Sturgeon tells MSPs
'Breaking' - Transgender rapist won’t be imprisoned in Scotland’s all-women jail, Nicola Sturgeon tells MSPs
RedToothBrush · 26/01/2023 18:54

yourhairiswinterfire · 26/01/2023 18:35

Every case is different and every individual will be risk assessed etc

We're supposed to trust their risk assessments? They concluded that it was fine for a man just found guilty of raping 2 women to go to a women's prison. And now they've decided that actually, he shouldn't be in a women's prison after all only because of the backlash and media attention.

If their ''risk assessment'' says being a double rapist isn't serious enough to exclude a man from women's prison, what is?!

'risk assessment' and 'rapist' shouldn't written on the same page when it comes to women's prison's.

Under which particular circumstances do they think a male who is serving a sentence for sexually harming a woman is appropriate to share facilities with vulnerable women?

Answers on a postcard.

Would be dead interesting to know the answer to this one, given that female prisons don't actually have the facilities to accommodate large numbers of Category A prisoners... Cos women offend much less and when they do offend they aren't any where near as likely to be violent to the point of needing to be housed in high security facilities...

Women's prison's literally aren't built to house rapists. Funny that.

CaveMum · 26/01/2023 18:55

I wouldn’t trust their “risk assessment” as far as I could throw it.

Said risk assessment has deemed Katie Dolatowski fit to be housed in the female estate. That’s Katie, a 22 year old 6ft5” convicted paedophile who was moved into a female prison AFTER “violently assaulting” a male inmate.

StephanieSuperpowers · 26/01/2023 18:57

The risk assessment is basically "is the media chasing this up? Y = men's prison, N = women's prison.

WalkthisWayUK · 26/01/2023 18:57

midgetastic · 26/01/2023 18:50

The default was womens jail
The outrage made that untenable
But it should never have been a question

I 100% agree the basic problem for me is that the default was women’s jail

So basically safeguarding comes second to gender.

WalkthisWayUK · 26/01/2023 19:00

I also do not how they justify all the huge extra costs if trans women are put in a women’s prison but ‘separated’ - there is huge costs to this in both physical premises and extra guards having to be specially put on. When the prison service is not able to house everyone as it is.

For all the posters saying well it’s OK if the trans woman can be separately accommodated, then for some reason it doesn’t matter.

EfingNora · 26/01/2023 19:01

@MargaritaPie "Trans-convicts (or those who claim they are trans)"
Such transphobia! They are who they say they are.

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 19:02

nonevernotever · 26/01/2023 17:54

- that there are so few DV and rape convictions in Scotland, because the prosecution service will not prosecute unless there are at least 2 witnesses
Isn't this because Scots law includes the principle of corroboration, where no accused person can be convicted on the basis of evidence from one source/person but instead requires at least two independent sources of evidence in support of each crucial fact. There are some rules which have developed in order to broaden what counts as corroboration so the doctrine of mutual corroboration for example where single witnesses to different incidents can corroborate each other if there are sufficient similarities.

This sounds correct based on the podcast I was listening to. In this case, it was 2 different girls at Gordonstoun who were raped at different times by the same teacher. I assume their evidence of their separate assaults by the same man would have corroborated each other, even though they hadn't been present for the other crime. The case collapsed for both prosecutions, because one of the (now adult) victims was too ill to give evidence, so her case couldn't corroborate the other.

However, how on earth the corroboration principle works for DV or rape where there is nobody else to bear witness, if you are the first or only victim, is disturbing to me. I've only just learned about it, so I don't know how corroboration works in practice, but it sounds like an incredibly difficult bar set for the prosecution. My nieces live in Scotland, I would hate for them to be on the wrong side of this rule should anything happen to them (god forbid).

ILikeDungs · 26/01/2023 19:05

StephanieSuperpowers · 26/01/2023 18:57

The risk assessment is basically "is the media chasing this up? Y = men's prison, N = women's prison.

Pretty well looks like that to me.

EfingNora · 26/01/2023 19:10

@RedToothBrush "answers on a postcard"
I could fit them on a stamp and still have room for the address.

Emotionalsupportviper · 26/01/2023 19:13

ReneBumsWombats · 26/01/2023 18:42

I'm pointing out the lunacy of the statement.

Whoops!

I find it hard to recognise irony sometimes her days, because the situation is so far beyond parody that it makes my brain hurt.

Apologies.

(And I do wish people didn't use the term "cis" - I know you were quoting - it's a vile slur and suggests that women are a subset of their own sex class).

FactsAreNotMean · 26/01/2023 19:13

Boiledbeetle · 26/01/2023 18:52

Which photo? This photo? Or this photo?😶

I meant the delightful leggings shot.

StephanieSuperpowers · 26/01/2023 19:17

Actually, I think this bloke is entitled to feel a bit aggrieved by the sudden change in rules just for his fine ass. The rule was that once you said you were a lady, you were, no backsises. He's not worse than some of the other fragrant doll faces gracing the ladies shower cubicles in other prisons.

Ameadowwalk · 26/01/2023 19:18

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 19:02

This sounds correct based on the podcast I was listening to. In this case, it was 2 different girls at Gordonstoun who were raped at different times by the same teacher. I assume their evidence of their separate assaults by the same man would have corroborated each other, even though they hadn't been present for the other crime. The case collapsed for both prosecutions, because one of the (now adult) victims was too ill to give evidence, so her case couldn't corroborate the other.

However, how on earth the corroboration principle works for DV or rape where there is nobody else to bear witness, if you are the first or only victim, is disturbing to me. I've only just learned about it, so I don't know how corroboration works in practice, but it sounds like an incredibly difficult bar set for the prosecution. My nieces live in Scotland, I would hate for them to be on the wrong side of this rule should anything happen to them (god forbid).

Corroboration makes it extremely difficult to prosecute rape or DV, my solicitor basically said the only way there was any chance of getting a prosecution was if there was more than one complainant.

borntobequiet · 26/01/2023 19:21

It looks as though trans convict is a thing. Next we will hear about all those cis convicts.
How language evolves.

ReneBumsWombats · 26/01/2023 19:22

Emotionalsupportviper · 26/01/2023 19:13

Whoops!

I find it hard to recognise irony sometimes her days, because the situation is so far beyond parody that it makes my brain hurt.

Apologies.

(And I do wish people didn't use the term "cis" - I know you were quoting - it's a vile slur and suggests that women are a subset of their own sex class).

It's OK. I know that there's so much absolute absurdity being stated as fact that it's not always possible to tell what the person's purpose is.

Still waiting for someone to explain to me why women's prisons exist at all. To safeguard women from men, or to reassure people that we all think they're women?

GailBlancheViola · 26/01/2023 19:26

To add another slant, where should men who rape men be imprisoned?

Is that supposed to be a serious question @Raera ? I'm guessing not since no-one could possibly be so lacking in intelligence to think it let alone ask it.

Or is it your attempt a winning 'gotcha'? If so you can mark it down as a colossal fail.

WalkthisWayUK · 26/01/2023 19:33

Still waiting for someone to explain to me why women's prisons exist at all I’m not your mum. Think about it! And if that doesn’t work, look up the history of women’s prisons…

Lottapianos · 26/01/2023 19:36

'To add another slant, where should men who rape men be imprisoned?

Is that supposed to be a serious question @Raera ? I'm guessing not since no-one could possibly be so lacking in intelligence to think it let alone ask'

I heard some other genius posing this question on the radio earlier. They seemed serious, and actually quite proud of themselves 🤦🏻‍♂️

ReneBumsWombats · 26/01/2023 19:37

WalkthisWayUK · 26/01/2023 19:33

Still waiting for someone to explain to me why women's prisons exist at all I’m not your mum. Think about it! And if that doesn’t work, look up the history of women’s prisons…

Are they segregated to keep women prisoners safe from men, or are they segregated to reassure women that people think they're women?

howmanybicycles · 26/01/2023 19:39

MargaritaPie · 26/01/2023 18:16

Trans-convicts (or those who claim they are trans) are decided on a case-by-case basis by the prison system as has been the case for many years. Every case is different and every individual will be risk assessed etc. Even if a transwoman is sent to a woman's prison they may be segregated and kept separate from the cis-women inmates.

"So therefore she is being transphobic"

IMO Nicola Sturgeon strikes a very good balance of supporting trans-rights and also considering potential risks and safeguarding matters. She is definitely not transphobic.

Do they ever put other women in men's prisons? What about, say, a woman who has xx chromosomes and associated secondary sexual characteristics? (Sorry, not sure how people who think TWAW describe actual women). If not them she is treating TW differently which, if you think TWAW as she purports to, is clearly transphobic. It certainly is as transphobic as JK rowling.

OneMorePlant · 26/01/2023 19:39

MargaritaPie · 26/01/2023 18:16

Trans-convicts (or those who claim they are trans) are decided on a case-by-case basis by the prison system as has been the case for many years. Every case is different and every individual will be risk assessed etc. Even if a transwoman is sent to a woman's prison they may be segregated and kept separate from the cis-women inmates.

"So therefore she is being transphobic"

IMO Nicola Sturgeon strikes a very good balance of supporting trans-rights and also considering potential risks and safeguarding matters. She is definitely not transphobic.

So MargaritaPie are you finally willing to explain to the rest of us how you tell the difference between people who are trans and people who are not trans but say they are trans?

whereaw · 26/01/2023 19:41

@MargaritaPie how is she not trans phobic? She's saying a trans woman isn't a real woman?

IcakethereforeIam · 26/01/2023 19:41

@ReneBumsWombats it's a pickle isn't it. Commonsense would say it's the first but recent events seem to demonstrate it's the later.

Maggie Personpeep should commit a crime. She might finally find out what sex she is.

Swipe left for the next trending thread