OJ has a special message for us…

[Cuppasoupmonster]

twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/1616008459958231040/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1616008459958231040&currentTweetUser=OwenJones84

Gave me a laugh over my coffee anyway 😆 does he remind anyone else of arguments with their little brother? ‘You’re going to lose. Why are you hitting yourself’ etc 😂

Interesting he has never ever once engaged with any of the thousands of points as to why gender ideology is indefensible at best and harmful at worst, it’s always just ‘You’re going to lose… tiny minority… section 28’

He's made the express 🤣
www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/opponents-snp-gender-bill-compared-29203125?utm_source=linkCopy&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

PoliticalFootball · Today 12:20

I think that you've phrased that very well and I agree entirely, especially the part about the system failure, which allows rapists to choose to be imprisoned in the women's estate.

The journo of the Scottish Express piece is deffo terfy
She’s been putting out some really good articles.

Dan Hodges responding to him on twitter: "...if you try to frame those who oppose rapists being placed in women’s prisons as extremists, then a majority of the country become extremists."

LOJ has done this to himself. We watched it, in real time. Where does he go from here?

It is a fascinating exercise in someone continuing to believe something even when the evidence for its falsity is presented to you directly. Is there a name for that? There ought to be.

Might find it in the DSM-5?

Narcissism.

Ooh, I remember one of Liz Truss’s former uni tutors during her leadership campaign last summer, who said that she was determined to be right, even in the face of overwhelming evidence against her belief. Don’t recall if he gave it a name though.

A zealot, maybe?

I apologise if this is not appropriate (I'm finding my feet) but I saw this and thought of this thread, given recent responses...

Clearly the answer is LOJ - he’s offended on behalf of the other three combined!

Aye - makes sense. I'm assuming Willoughby is India Willoughby. Not sure who Monty refers to, though.

Bit pretentious of Willoughby to assume an entire country as a forename, mind.

That being said, I did in my early twenties enjoy a brief relationship with a lass whose parents had named her Vienna - apparently because that is where they convinced themselves that he'd "sowed the seed that did the deed." I don't think that they had any pretensions, though. Nor her.

Monty is Katie Montgomery

Ta, ducks. Still none the wiser but it gives a steer for a bit of Googling!

Post-Googling: Oh, FFS!!

Yeah. Monty's refusal to distinguish between women declining to play along and literal violence can get a bit much.

It's cognitive dissonance. They believe women and tw are the same. It's irrelevant if they rape etc as the identity trumps sex. Plus a weird idea that a man who says he's a woman magically becomes vulnerable in the same way as women and physically weak like a woman etc all the sexist stuff

You're telling me!!!

One shouldn't mock people for their mental health issues but I strongly suspect that I might be forgiven for suggesting that, after an admittedly brief perusal of her witterings, in several topical areas her feet would appear to have well and truly slipped off of the pedals.

Again, apols if this is not proper - and I've yet to check its veracity (vis his support for NS), but this seems at least vaguely germane at this time...

Also, "LOJ...??"

Little Owen Jones? Lost Owen Jones? Lying Owen Jones...?

Little Owen Jones

Though I'm still not sure where this came from.

I’ve always been fond of ‘Sanctimonious Morph’ (diminutive sidekick to ‘Magic Grandad’)

Love that Suzanne Moore gave it a wee like.

Generally the first one, but I’m happy to roll with the other two as well. If the cap fits…

One of his boyfriends...?? Childish snigger

Ooooookay. So putting something between two asterisks codes it into bold rather than showing it between two asterisks.

Noted...

Is there anything else I should know rather than "learning the hard way...?"