Green, then an IT-manager, was utterly open about how she first knew her child was trans: “As a toddler, Jackie always headed for the dolls in toy shops.”
Green took pains to stress that being trans child went deeper than a desire for dolls. But how else would a four-year-old boy express a wish to be a girl other than through the medium of toys?
the child then known as Jack told his mother, “God made a mistake and I should have been a girl.
So when four-year-old Jack told her he should be a girl, Green felt “it explained so many things”.
How can she not see it???? She spent years telling her son that he must be a girl. Right up to denying that the issue, toy choice, even was the issue. It was merely an 'indication' of something else. Rather begs the question of why remove them all then??
Hadley has summed up the entire nonsensical premise with this paragraph.
Green says that as soon as her baby boy “got mobile” — ie, learned to crawl — “he was gravitating to things that you would think are stereotypically female”. Like what, tampons?