There are those on Twitter who are really not very well at all, and I'm not commenting there, however I will say to link these kind of tweets and attitudes to what Red's DH describes above.
Mermaids' 5th safeguarding disaster is that they frame standard, normal, every day safeguarding concerns - that most organisations working with children would be aghast to be responsible for and frantically addressing - as 'transphobia' and persecution.
They have been key in framing the idea that TQ+ involvement renders a situation untouchable, above standards and norms, and that to attempt to hold them to standards or to even talk about the situation as a failure or concern is transphobic . They hadn't even read the Cass report. Silly nonsense that 'doesn't understand'.
They have been key in framing the whole sex positive agenda connected with DQST, and the idea that TQ+ children are different, and that safeguarding is silly pearl clutching that is old hat now anyway. Hence their interesting choice of trustee, which would have been done with eyes wide open thinking how very progressive, modern and right he was.
The safeguarding disasters are not hapless accidents, they are rooted in the values and beliefs of the ideology. Hence now that more vulnerable TQ+ people see any boundary, challenge or consequence as justified cause for 'hate'.
This is going to eventually need an inquiry because the damage done is immense. It is going to take years to fix the damage that has insinuated itself everywhere because of this agenda.