Yes exactly.
Decades ago, accommodations were made, often without our consent. At that time, trans people were assumed to be a small group suffering such crippling dysphoria that they were driven to undergo drastic surgery to live as the opposite sex. Not, let's be very clear, believed to in some inner way be the opposite sex, but with some limitations, accomodated as the opposite sex. A polite fiction to support a group of vulnerable people.
This is now being weaponised against us with the bad faith argument that, because these accommodations have existed for some time, women have no right to disagree to extending them a much larger group of male people, very few of whom intend to make any physical adjustments to their masculinity nor even understand the female culture to which they claim they belong.
It reminds me of the type of rape apologist that believes if a woman consented to sex with someone in the past, they cannot say no to that person or his mates in future.