I answered that it depends on your worldview. Her experiences of being mixed race resonate with my own of being mixed race. Not every mixed race person will have the same view or experiences of it.
So because your worldview is to be interested in race you don’t worry about truth, as long as it resonates?
I don't doubt many people make stuff up about the various parts of their identity to push another agenda but what she said about being mixed race - in one particular interview (granted I haven't seen everything she's ever said about race), resonated with me.
Again, Bergdorf has made up something pretty fundamental about themselves. Doesn’t that set off alarm bells? But because it resonated with you, you don’t have any alarm bells?
I do find myself interrogating a lot of what people say about the mixed experience
But you don’t feel the need with Bergdorf. Why? What was so convincing about how Bergdorf told this part of their lives that is any different to how Bergdorf emphatically tells us Bergdorf is a woman?
I would sound rather bigoted telling someone who explains their experiences of racism that it didn't really happen because it never happened to me or that there is no scientific paper that quantifies their experience.
So even though Bergdorf emphatically tells us something that can be objectively shown to be not true - that Bergdorf is a woman - it’s perfectly reasonable to believe something Bergdorf tells us that is completely subjective?
That makes no sense to me. If someone so blatantly defies objective reality then any subjective reality they describe would be instantly less believable. If someone concurs with objective reality I’m much more inclined to believe their descriptions of other aspects of their existence.