Thanks for posting that. It's a good email and I agree mostly with the substance of it. It's worth posting the main content, I think:
"I realise the country faces challenges. There are some concerns, however, that are of fundamental importance to me: protecting women and girls’ single sex spaces and safeguarding children. When it comes to the next general election, I will not vote for somebody who endorses gender identity ideology because of the huge risks it poses to women and children.
I therefore urge you to ask the following questions of any candidate you are preparing to support:
Their definition of the word 'woman'.
Whether they are committed to protecting same sex spaces and services for women and girls such as public toilets, school toilets, changing rooms, hospital wards, domestic violence refuges, local rape crisis counselling services and women's prisons.
What they intend to do about children being exposed to gender identity theory and overtly sexual RSE teaching at an inappropriate age at school.
Please be aware that whatever else you are told or may believe, this is a matter of the utmost concern to many, many women in the UK. If the new Prime Minister does not commit to taking those concerns to heart, the Conservatives are at risk of losing seats. Voters will desert the party at the next election in the same way that party members have left the Labour Party and the LibDems - and for the same reasons. Women are angry. Parents are angry."
Apart from the 'trick' question about the definition of 'woman', one key thing that's missing is any reference to the changing of the meaning and use of language and the replacement in official documents, information and data collection such as the census, crime or health statistics, or government departments' correspondence and policy documents, of the category 'sex' with 'gender' (ambiguously either sex or gender identity) or 'gender identity' or other terms such as 'non binary' whatever that is.
I do think that's an important issue for MPs and government.