Ok. Your posts read just like those senior team leaders and managers from Maya Forstater's employer. That she can hold the views she has but there is no way that she can responsibility discuss them without causing harm to some people.
Whether you intended to do this or not, this is how I and others have read it.
To confirm. No, women are not responsible at all that immature, violent and abusive people deciding they should come and shout and abuse women when they hold 'speaker's corner' style sessions in different cities or organise conferences and seminars.
However, the fact that some other groups agree with feminists on this topic and those groups post content produced by feminists on this topic makes those immature, violent and abusive people react the way they do.
Great. You have made that point. What about that point? Because the implication as you have left it is like the cycle I mentioned above.
The implication is a sleight of hand way of saying that women should change their behaviour if they don't want those abusive aggressive people to turn up to intimidate the. That is how these posts can be read.
Or shall we just cut to the chase and say, some very immature, violent and abusive people cannot engage in any other way and the community they are supposedly supporting doesn't seem to be pushing back on the way these protesters are acting nor do they distance themselves publicly from them.
The issue is fully with them and their lack of ability to act as adults.
The onus is not on women to change their behaviour in any way.