Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Help with talking to a 12 yr old about trans issues

1006 replies

GoingOnce · 28/04/2022 18:57

My son has a friend whose sister is apparently now his brother. I sense my son wants to talk to me about this and I want to have the right language to engage sensibly in a conversation. He has swallowed whole the ideology that people can change their gender as this has been “explained” to them at school. The child does not attend my son’s school but still attends a girls school - whilst going by a new name, wearing an adapted and having a special toilet assigned just for them.

The child in question (and the entire family) is struggling. There is self-harm and have been suicide attempts. I do not want to criticise them or their child. But I do want my child to realise that they are being presented with one narrative here. (I am quite certain the parents are simply going along with the whole thing because they are terrified of their child’s mental state and what they might do next. I feel very sorry for them).

Any advice for how I can discuss this sensibly? I can’t believe at age 12 we are already having to talk about all this.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:15

DomesticatedZombie · 12/05/2022 09:53

If someone is heavily invested in how kind they are, but can't help making repeated attacks on other people trying to have a discussion it must be hard to maintain that self image. Cognitive dissonance is hard work.

Did I say I was kind?

Ironic btw, given your level of contribution has been to pop up just to have a go at me!

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:16

Helleofabore · 12/05/2022 08:16

Except in the case where parents support the decision,

Sorry, I might have missed something here. What do you do to establish whether the parent does support the social transitioning of their child?

And what do you do when a parent doesn’t either know, or support, the social transitioning of their child?

Apologies if you have answered. Please let me know the page number where you answered and I will go back. Ad I said, I might have missed it.

That isn't my job.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:17

Helleofabore · 12/05/2022 07:57

We had training recently as I spoke about earlier on the thread and strangely enough it was rodgmum , despite people claiming on the thread how horrifically awful I am to everyone, that really got me thinking about WHY I'm so pro transgender. Simply put, it's because I see physical children sitting in front of me every day, I guess.

Simply put, it's because I see physical children sitting in front of me every day, I guess.

The point is, as I and others have raised, some of us also ‘see physical children sitting in front of us every day’.

That is the fucking point.

It is the point why many of the people posting about this topic on this board have done extensive research and do not depend on a heavily invested organization to tell us what we should be thinking.

Poster’s OWN personal situation. In their daily lives covering many more activities than would ever be discussed or witnessed in a school situation. Plus the experience of how their particular school deals with social transitioning. FFS.

One poster on this thread spoke of a school.

I was told on the last page how ARROGANT I am to base my views on my school. Is that just me, then?

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:18

DomesticatedZombie · 11/05/2022 21:46

No. We were discussing Lily Madigan, who has been accused of several sexual assaults.

Not at 17, she wasnt.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:19

PrelateChuckles · 12/05/2022 12:29

It's even more of an issue when anyone thinks they can't possibly be breaking safeguarding principles because they - the adult - feel kindly about specific children. Essentially "how is my misleading a child putting them at risk, when I like them?"

What an utterly...bizarre....point to make. Very odd.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 12/05/2022 22:38

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 12/05/2022 19:18

Not at 17, she wasnt.

Unless you are implying that people are incapable of committing sexual assault until they turn 18, that is precisely the point.

We plan for the worst, and keep female spaces female only, because we can never know which male person is going to be abusive. But assuming someone is safe because they have not been implicated in behaviour facilitates violence against women!

People do not walk around with hovering signs above their heads saying "I will commit sexual assault, given the opportunity". A DBS check is only ever evidence that someone hasn't been caught yet, not a certification of sainthood. While we're on the subject, abuse victims often delay making allegations out of fear of reprisal, or fear of the investigative process, or their own state of denial.

If a hypothetical young person is accused of sexually assaulting multiple people at university, it would be more likely that they had also engaged in abusive behaviour at school and sixth form, than it would be that they had had a complete personality change during Freshers' Week.

Helleofabore · 12/05/2022 22:48

One poster on this thread spoke of a school.

There has been more than one. I have spoken of a school as well as rogdmum.

There has been more than one parent posting on this thread. I guess you really have completely discounted other parents on this thread.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 12/05/2022 22:50

Your posts imply you think LM should have been allowed to use girls' toilets.

So I ask, if it was up to you to give permission to a male transitioner to use female-only spaces at a school, and you gave permission, how many sexual assaults would they have to be accused of before you questioned your initial judgement?

How many assaults before you felt you'd failed the female pupils?

sowiwag · 12/05/2022 23:24

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou:
"Not interested"

Indeed. I thought I was probably wasting my time. Oh well. Never mind.

SeanChailleach · 13/05/2022 08:34

@sowiwag
I guess the thread is already at best on a siding away from the main line by now, anyway.
Lol
Fwiw I enjoyed your post. I love a bit of philosophy on the nature of truth to start the day.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 00:37

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 12/05/2022 22:50

Your posts imply you think LM should have been allowed to use girls' toilets.

So I ask, if it was up to you to give permission to a male transitioner to use female-only spaces at a school, and you gave permission, how many sexual assaults would they have to be accused of before you questioned your initial judgement?

How many assaults before you felt you'd failed the female pupils?

For fucks sake. It implied nothing of the sort.

I have said multiple multiple times I dont agree with it.

So piss off with the frankly libellous posts.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 00:39

Helleofabore · 12/05/2022 22:48

One poster on this thread spoke of a school.

There has been more than one. I have spoken of a school as well as rogdmum.

There has been more than one parent posting on this thread. I guess you really have completely discounted other parents on this thread.

Now now.

Dont be deceitful.

Weve moved past page 4 where I proved I wasnt dismissing anyones views after an attempt to make out I do.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 00:39

SeanChailleach · 13/05/2022 08:34

@sowiwag
I guess the thread is already at best on a siding away from the main line by now, anyway.
Lol
Fwiw I enjoyed your post. I love a bit of philosophy on the nature of truth to start the day.

I'm glad it entertained you, as it was a waste of time attempt to goad me.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 00:40

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 12/05/2022 22:38

Unless you are implying that people are incapable of committing sexual assault until they turn 18, that is precisely the point.

We plan for the worst, and keep female spaces female only, because we can never know which male person is going to be abusive. But assuming someone is safe because they have not been implicated in behaviour facilitates violence against women!

People do not walk around with hovering signs above their heads saying "I will commit sexual assault, given the opportunity". A DBS check is only ever evidence that someone hasn't been caught yet, not a certification of sainthood. While we're on the subject, abuse victims often delay making allegations out of fear of reprisal, or fear of the investigative process, or their own state of denial.

If a hypothetical young person is accused of sexually assaulting multiple people at university, it would be more likely that they had also engaged in abusive behaviour at school and sixth form, than it would be that they had had a complete personality change during Freshers' Week.

Dont really know what to say other than simply not true.

SeldomHere · 14/05/2022 01:56

tabbycatstripy · 28/04/2022 19:35

Explain that most people once believed the Earth was flat, and in the past people thought diseases were spread by bad smells, and that people of different races were of inherently different worth, and those things were ‘explained’ to kids in schools as well. Something can be untrue even if every person on Earth thinks otherwise.

What of those who believe different sexes are of inherent different worth.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 02:00

SeldomHere · 14/05/2022 01:56

What of those who believe different sexes are of inherent different worth.

Like here.
When boys and men are worth less.tham women and girls.

Helleofabore · 14/05/2022 07:27

Weve moved past page 4 where I proved I wasnt dismissing anyones views after an attempt to make out I do.

No. You proved nothing. You tried to convince people with your adamance but failed.

I have also relayed to you experiences with my child’s school, as have other parents. Somehow, you choose to minimise and dismiss them.

You really seem to be fucking unable to take on anyone else’s experiences in your determination that you are righteous.

Are you so determined to believe that what we are telling you is and has happened is what, lies? Misunderstandings from our end? FFS.

You continue to miss the point. Some of us are also ‘physically’ with teens who identify as trans on a ‘daily basis’. In our daily life, in our homes.

And when I asked you what you do when a parent is not supporting the schools actions or doesn’t even you, you simply state ‘not my job’.

So does that mean you don’t care that the parents may not be supportive of the schools actions?

Does that mean you don’t ascertain that the parents know and agree first? Because it isn’t your job and you are just carrying out what someone with more authority says?

Or are you continuing to state it just doesn’t happen?

Because I know very well it does happen, so what do you do when you discover a child/teen that the school has agreed to socially transition hasn’t got parents permission or even told their parents?

OldCrone · 14/05/2022 07:57

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 00:37

For fucks sake. It implied nothing of the sort.

I have said multiple multiple times I dont agree with it.

So piss off with the frankly libellous posts.

Well, you did say (about Lily Madigan):

The 19 year old who wasn't allowed in a female toilet, was forced to wear boys uniform and called her dead name throughout school?

Barrel of laughs.

This implies (to me) that you think LM should have been allowed to use the girls' toilet, as well as being allowed to wear the girls' uniform and being called Lily.

If you find other posters are frequently misunderstanding what you intend to convey in your posts, perhaps you should consider making your meaning clearer, so that this is less likely to happen.

Whatwouldscullydo · 14/05/2022 08:10

The message clearly seems to be that despite the fact girls are being placed in physical danger by having males change in with them and ending up with cracked ribs and breathing difficulties as a result of binders , is less of a problem.than boys laughing at other male children. And that expecting males to take responsibility for their own hostility towards bin conforming males is somehow favouring girls.

Between being laughed at and being unable to breathe properly and missing pe because you cant run for very long, which is nore physically and permanently damaging?

Why isn't it the responsibility of males to sort their own shit out. Why do women and girls only get what they need if men say they can and of we have sorted out all their problems first?

sowiwag · 14/05/2022 11:25

SeanChailleach · 13/05/2022 08:34

@sowiwag
I guess the thread is already at best on a siding away from the main line by now, anyway.
Lol
Fwiw I enjoyed your post. I love a bit of philosophy on the nature of truth to start the day.

Thanks SeanChailleach.

Yes, what is truth? Fun.

I notice, in my dotage, the spread of those who add to the promulgation of lies the propagation of misapprehensions about the nature of truth – essentially for the same reasons in both cases of course. ’Twas ever thus? Maybe. Lately exacerbated by social media etc., though but.

Some of this is deliberate, some accidental; the poster stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou who just does not understand, and is not interested, for example. Still dangerous? I think so.

(MN sex & gender board, a microcosm – with its own individual importance too of course – of those who gather to express the problem and fight back.)

I wonder what appropriate measures we might/should (morally, rationally, democratically) take to save ourselves and our children, not just from those who consciously and intentionally distress public understanding for nefarious means, but from cognitively-challenged fellow-travellers like stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou here – of which there seem to be legion. Hmm?

MagnoliaTaint · 14/05/2022 12:53

Children/young people are going to meet and encounter many people who don't have the best intentions, unfortunately. They need to learn how to handle these situations.

Having worked in schools, and now parenting children going through the education system, I've come across all sorts of people in education with ideas, drives, or beliefs that could potentially be damaging to children - from the hardcore Christian teacher who sent home a primary 2 class in tears with graphic descriptions of crucifixion, to the predatory paedophiles, to the plain common or garden teachers who can't discipline a class and resort to draconian punishments. These people exist, and always will do. (And that is absolutely not to discount the many committed, supportive, nurturing, and highly skilled staff and teachers who work in schools, who are of course the majority).

So, I talk with my children, listen to their concerns, and help them to develop critical thinking and strategies for dealing with people in positions of power who may be less able or willing to look out for the best interests of those in their care - whether that is done with good or bad faith.

The problems we face now are where the potentially harmful issues/ideologies are actually getting baked into legislation, presented as the single True Way, and where teachers/staff are unable or too scared to question or dissent. Of course this is all the red flags out waving. Hopefully at some point those in power will take notice of all the many people pointing out the issues - the creation of sacred castes, the authoritarian dogma, the erosion of trust, the reliance on faith-based assertions that aren't to be questioned, etc.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 13:11

OldCrone · 14/05/2022 07:57

Well, you did say (about Lily Madigan):

The 19 year old who wasn't allowed in a female toilet, was forced to wear boys uniform and called her dead name throughout school?

Barrel of laughs.

This implies (to me) that you think LM should have been allowed to use the girls' toilet, as well as being allowed to wear the girls' uniform and being called Lily.

If you find other posters are frequently misunderstanding what you intend to convey in your posts, perhaps you should consider making your meaning clearer, so that this is less likely to happen.

No they really dont.

I have said frequently I dong agree with shared spaces.

However , a poster , I forget who now, seemed to imply that Lily was being championed as an adult.

I simply pointed out her school experience mist have been hard for her.

In the real world, we dont pretend otherwise through our dislike of trans.

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 13:12

sowiwag · 14/05/2022 11:25

Thanks SeanChailleach.

Yes, what is truth? Fun.

I notice, in my dotage, the spread of those who add to the promulgation of lies the propagation of misapprehensions about the nature of truth – essentially for the same reasons in both cases of course. ’Twas ever thus? Maybe. Lately exacerbated by social media etc., though but.

Some of this is deliberate, some accidental; the poster stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou who just does not understand, and is not interested, for example. Still dangerous? I think so.

(MN sex & gender board, a microcosm – with its own individual importance too of course – of those who gather to express the problem and fight back.)

I wonder what appropriate measures we might/should (morally, rationally, democratically) take to save ourselves and our children, not just from those who consciously and intentionally distress public understanding for nefarious means, but from cognitively-challenged fellow-travellers like stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou here – of which there seem to be legion. Hmm?

.🤣🤣

stopwaitingforpermissiontobeyou · 14/05/2022 13:15

Helleofabore · 14/05/2022 07:27

Weve moved past page 4 where I proved I wasnt dismissing anyones views after an attempt to make out I do.

No. You proved nothing. You tried to convince people with your adamance but failed.

I have also relayed to you experiences with my child’s school, as have other parents. Somehow, you choose to minimise and dismiss them.

You really seem to be fucking unable to take on anyone else’s experiences in your determination that you are righteous.

Are you so determined to believe that what we are telling you is and has happened is what, lies? Misunderstandings from our end? FFS.

You continue to miss the point. Some of us are also ‘physically’ with teens who identify as trans on a ‘daily basis’. In our daily life, in our homes.

And when I asked you what you do when a parent is not supporting the schools actions or doesn’t even you, you simply state ‘not my job’.

So does that mean you don’t care that the parents may not be supportive of the schools actions?

Does that mean you don’t ascertain that the parents know and agree first? Because it isn’t your job and you are just carrying out what someone with more authority says?

Or are you continuing to state it just doesn’t happen?

Because I know very well it does happen, so what do you do when you discover a child/teen that the school has agreed to socially transition hasn’t got parents permission or even told their parents?

I've never been righteous in my life. I just have a different opinion. Ifs allowed.

Are you aware of how patronising you are?

Helleofabore · 14/05/2022 13:45

So again, no answer to my question on what you would do if the parents have not given permission, who may not even know what the school is doing when the school is transitioning their child.

This is exactly where a ‘difference of opinion’ is harmful, isn’t it? Do you or don’t you support a school transitioning a child or teen without permission, without even the knowledge of the parents?

You are someone who has told us you are working with students. It is you who won’t answer the question I have asked.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.