@YellowHpok it’s a great question - one one level I’d want to think it’s a transient social fashion that will fade out in a few years. I hope that will be the case.
However, I kind of also thought that the gender crowd would row back on the “most oppressed!” stuff when the reality of what’s happening in Ukraine kicked in - that reality might reassert itself a bit faced with real war and real bloodshed and violence (for example that we might hear a bit less about the nonexistent “trans genocide” when faced with the reality of actual genocide, twentieth century style, right in front of us.
But that doesn’t seem to have happened. The ideological juggernaut is still in full force despite all that, especially in the US, where being misgendered whilst in possession of some anime cat ears seems to be as great a psychic injury as fleeing from Russian tanks. So I think it’s got some Teflon-clad way to go yet, sadly.
Sometimes in my most despondent moods I ponder the fact that for the last couple of thousand years we have seemed to go through periods of idealism followed by periods of scientific materialism pretty regularly, swinging back and forth approximately every hundred years or so. So the nineteenth century was dominated by religious thought and individualist idealism; the twentieth century largely by empiricism and scientific materialism, and so on. On that model we might be overdue to a swing back to religious idealism - perhaps already emerging in the form of gender ideology and the weakening of Western societies’ collective trust in the scientific method. As I say, I hope that’s only a conjecture - but sometimes I do think we may be on the verge of a new era of ideological fanaticism, belief in immaterial “souls”, essences, made-up ideas and fantasies of personal and collective “identities”.
We’ve already seen a sharp swing away from the rationalism and internationalism of the late twentieth century, and back towards a fixation on “national identity” which for a while we thought we had left behind in the past.
I think that’s happening with our understanding of culture and psychology. We’re moving away from quite a sophisticated late twentieth-century social-scientific view of “identities” as social narrative constructions; and reverting to very limited late nineteenth/early twentieth century ideas about national identity, gender identity, cultural identity — which tend to be quasi-religious and all about innate souls and “feelings” and beliefs and stereotypes and mystification. So I do sometimes feel quite pessimistic about that, to be honest. Also sorry, v long post!