@OldCrone i will ask you what I've asked others.
As a woman with female friends, female nieces, female relatives - why do you think I would "what about" when we are all at risk?
I've acknowledged several times in this thread that I'm on board with separate spaces, dont agree with mixed prisons, etc etc.
So just because I care about my boy pupils as much as my female pupils its "what about the men?"
No. Its what about ALL pupils.
The diversion to men started because I identified that the barrier to gender just being "label less" is not girls - girls have it much easier in that department. Its boys. Boys have the odds stacked against them (I'd say men, because to me 17 year olds are men, but I don't want to be misunderstood again).
When it comes to trans, despite all the concerns (which incidentally as I asked earlier, do they come from the abhorrent stories about adult men - given that I've already agreed i don't agree with mixed changing) the biggest barrier to gender being label less and childhood trans is not our view of girls. It's our view of boys. If a girl came to school with short hair, baggy jeans and a shirt, no one would bat an eyelid. If a boy came to school in a skirt and make up....?
My point being, we are passing on our concerns and anger (rightful anger) about adult men onto young boys. And that ultimately has a waterfall effect on all children, trans or otherwise.