I'm going to ask again. What does rape by male prison officers or female on female sexual assault in female prisons have to do with introducing more males into the female estate in the form of transwomen? Why are you correlating these issues?
I am actually quite confused here.
Is it really just a case that a poster has become entrenched in trying to convince us that women need better protection in prison (which we all wholeheartedly agree) that it has become such a polarised issue on this thread.
Do some women commit sex assaults in prison? Yes. We know they do.
What has this got to do with the original article posted? Nothing. Unless a poster is trying to distract people away from the post, or are attempting whatboutery to progress their own agenda. Which is what? That all women in prison should be better protected. And around we go ....
The issue being discussed is the placement of a male prisoner in a female prison.
Just as another pp stated (regardless of the intent of their post), let's get rid of the 'trans'! YES!!!! These are males. They need to be placed in with other vulnerable male prisoners.
There are facilities for that.
In fact, a shiny new building was created for transitioned male prisoners in England, and it was rejected by the lobby groups. That tells me all I need to know about the priority of females to those lobby groups and to the departments that have continued to allow males into female prison estates.