Seriously, the optics on this are very, very poor.
Charlie appears to be a white male teenager. Charlie has gone shopping for a prom dress at Monsoon, which is a high street retailer, but priced towards the high end of high street. I doubt that is reflected in staff wages though, so I think it won't be much about minimum wage.
Charlie has then been rude, on a publicly viewable post, about a black woman's make-up, at a particular store. So she's identifiable, too. White male customer being rude about black staff member's appearance. This is seriously problematic. This looks like racism and classism to me.
And then we have you, Janet, apparently condoning that, and instead going after an MNer who has positive recollections of unidentified women she has met, who didn't defer to bepenised people.
Dodgyyyyyy. Did you just not bother to read the screenshot?
As for "towards trans people"? Give me a break. Penis does NOT equal trans. There are many people who are not trans, who have a penis. And there are many people who do not have a penis, who are not trans.