@GoodJanetBadJanet
,Or are you just going to have a go at the MNer who only has positive things to say about her experiences of older afro-Caribbean women?
It was more the '' I've met old a Carribbean women and this is what they and their attitudes are like. ''
Bit of a generalisation, what all?
Seems a weird thing to say, it's not something you'd usually say about people just because you've met a couple.
Different to a description of one person, even if it wasn't a complimentary one.
What made you think she's only met a couple of Afro-Caribbean women in her life? Are you perhaps projecting here? I've certainly met far more than a couple!
Explain to me why a positive generalisation is worse than a person making negative remarks about the appearance of an identifiable individual on the internet. Charlie did not have to answer that question from a randomer at all. The only reason another member of the public would need to ask that information is in order to identify the staff member, possibly to harass them. The only people who should have been getting a description of a the member of staff should have been Monsoon, in a private communication.
Yet, not only did Charlie give a description, Charlie expressed themselves disparagingly in the process.
This level of contempt makes me rather wonder how Charlie acted in store when there wasn't an audience.
Different to a description of one person, even if it wasn't a complimentary one
Yes. It is different. Charlie's behaviour is a hell of a lot worse. So why are you giving it a pass?
Is there a special rule that white people who identify as trans are allowed to be derogatory about black women? To set them up for harassment?