Green Party - conference - votes starting soon

[DomesticatedZombie]

in 5 minutes!

A reminder!

Feminists, please attend - and please vote the motion to 'purge' women who've signed the women's rights declaration Out of Order.

Molly Scott Cato is TWAW/TMAM/NBIAV. Don't know about Liz.

I don't know why individuals voted against hearing it.

Liz said the police were dealing with it.(this doesn't stop us examining how the party could have done a better job protecting victims)
Molly said a professional report would cost too much. (I just can't even... )

No.

I think Claire is just making a sarcastic comment about how hard it will be to submit an emergency motion in the short time available for proposing them if there needs to be consultation with liberation groups. But it isn't a requirement yet so wouldn't affect this emergency motion.

A couple of others made the same comment, would this have been sarcasm too?

(This is not me being sarcastic!)

When someone explained it to me it sounded very complicated rule wise and more about the rules and fact police were involved. (I couldn't even begin to explain it.)

Either way it's clearly not the fault of the "GCs"

Either way it's clearly not the fault of the "GCs"

Isn't everything our fault?

More misogyny, what a surprise!

What happened kn the end to the vote to purge members who had signed the declaration on womens human rights?

It didn't go through.

It was right though and based on only around 500 votes as far as I can tell?

More need to vote or give proxies.

*Tight

@Manderleyagain

What happened kn the end to the vote to purge members who had signed the declaration on womens human rights?

Voted down, thankfully. But yes, it was all quite close.

@WarriorN

A couple of others made the same comment, would this have been sarcasm too?

(This is not me being sarcastic!)

When someone explained it to me it sounded very complicated rule wise and more about the rules and fact police were involved. (I couldn't even begin to explain it.)

Either way it's clearly not the fault of the "GCs"

I worked with Claire on the Standing Orders Committee so know both her style of sarcasm and the party rules quite well.

this is crazy, why would feminists not want the GP to look at it's procedures around allegations of sexual harassment?

Er, who said feminists didn't?

Name changed.

As I understand it, No, it's not the latter part of the motion that was the issue.

I'm sure that would have gone through.