He mentioned Quinn because they won a medal, ie a tangible achievement. While Hubbard, despite the insistence that trans women will automatically dominate women's sport, failed to even make a lift, let alone get placed.
A female person won a medal in a female event. Marvellous. We can celebrate that just as we celebrate all other Olympian medallists, and if (biologically) male people who identify as trans were competing in male events, then I'm sure we would all celebrate and applaud their successes too.
A middle aged biologically male person taking a spot in a female event at the Olympics however, denying the chance to be an Olympian to a young woman who’s trained as hard as she can for it and who rightly deserved to be there - and that person then mysteriously massively underperforming on the day compared to that person’s own previous gold medal “winning” successes, enabling people like you to say, “look, Hubbard had no advantage at all!” - well, I don’t see anything to celebrate or applaud in that. Quite the opposite.
I ask you again, Blueberry: why is it so hard for you to break the habit of male oppression of females? Why are you quite so dedicated to doing your best to make the world an even more unsafe, unfair, unrewarding place for biologically female people than it already is?
Is it because you don’t see us as fully human?