I think in trying to be kind, some people do pretzel their thoughts to make this into something it is not.
This most definitely is creating a child for someone. A deliberate act that does indeed remove that infant from their birth mother directly after birth. Does Tom Daley keep the child in contact with the surrogate? Include that surrogate in the life of the child?
As pps continue to point out, there is a chasm between surrogacy and adoption of a child already created. However I think many people like to gloss over the distinction. Designer babies is never comfortable to acknowledge is happening.
Also, the minimising of the risks associated with pregnancy is appalling. Being pregnant causes so many reactions in the body. Many minor things that people wouldn’t even think about. But yes, ultimately some that are life limiting, and certainly some that remove fertility forever.
And not just the surrogates but the egg donors as well. As some young student egg donors have discovered in the USA.
No. When you get men insisting on ‘equal reproductive rights’ in New York, meaning ‘some woman can carry my child and put their body in danger and receive a modicum of funds for the risk and it is MY RIGHT to have this service’, you know there is something seriously fucked up in society and with the process.