Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lush Binder Collection

267 replies

Sexnotgender · 08/11/2021 21:06

Assuming this is a way for predominantly children to circumvent parents and get their hands on a binder.

Lush Binder Collection
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
foxgoosefinch · 08/11/2021 23:20

It looks like there is a charity they’ve teamed up with that is providing them to the girls if they pay £7. Cheap binders are also potentially damaging, so are they also just giving out not very safe cheap ones? Who knows 🤷‍♀️ But yes, I think this kind of thing is largely to give access to them to girls without their parents’ knowledge, basically.

Helleofabore · 08/11/2021 23:33

Isthatthebestyoucando

Yes. They seem to be doing just that.

noraclavicle · 08/11/2021 23:34

No mention of a lower age limit on the Instagram post. That’s a big red flag waving right there.

Fluffymule · 09/11/2021 00:24

Leaving the safeguarding and moral issue aside for a moment, just what are Lush thinking?!? Their insurance company can't possibly be aware of this. A liability suit waiting to happen surely?

Facilitating products to minors, encouraging concealment from parents/guardians, that may cause physical harm to the kids? This has to be a rogue employee, not a corporate policy.

CheeseMmmm · 09/11/2021 01:21

Insurance for what?

I think the binders are being distributed by a separate org anyway.

Pascal80 · 09/11/2021 01:51

I didn't know girls bound their breasts. Why? Are they binding their breasts because they are pretending to be boys? and there is actual clothing for this purpose.. Why would Lush be condoning and encouraging it - I don't understand what tf going on. It's awful.

CheeseMmmm · 09/11/2021 01:54

Binding is generally related to girls who feel want to be non binary or boys.

The fact that why is no breasts the thing if non binary is never explained. It's male as default human.

The fact that loads of girls find breasts growing really difficult. And always have. Don't want them. For loads of reasons.

Is also never discussed.

Mummyoflittledragon · 09/11/2021 05:33

Christ a new low for lush. I have only been in there once when dd was younger as she wanted to spend her Christmas money. Never again. I I hope they are ripped to shreds but I suspect not. How can this and the ‘charity’ be legal ffs.

Kotatsu · 09/11/2021 05:51

Oh god - I was desperate to reduce mine (and the shape, get them flatter) - I used to sleep on my front, bought the M&S reducing bras (kinda spread it round to your armpit), tried bandaging after watching Shakespear in Love etc... Like another OP, I just needed to get used to them, there was nothing wrong at all (and now I'm older I also appreciate how lovely I looked back then, when at the time I thought everything was wrong with me)

I would have permanently damaged myself. Girls are going to permanently damage themselves. It's truly awful.

I can't boycott Lush any more than I already do though - although at least ex is out of the picture and won't be lazily buying me bath bombs for Christmas this year (which the kids steal for their baths anyway)

Forgotthebins · 09/11/2021 06:18

This is gross. A company that willingly promotes the tools for young people to permanently damage their bodies is the other side of a bright red line. I have never bought Starbucks since the Mermaids partnership, and I used to love Starbucks, but this showed me that it is not a responsible company. If this is more than one rogue employee, then the same will go for Lush.

Catawaul · 09/11/2021 06:18

This is awful. Lush being sort of cult-ish in a certain age group of girls promotes binding as to be expected, a rite of passage, like getting your first bra. The secrecy aspect is frightening. How dare they?

Beamur · 09/11/2021 06:42

Lush are abusing the trust of so many of their customers with this promotion. Truly dreadful. There's no safe way to bind.

Whatwouldscullydo · 09/11/2021 06:51

Even without the potential rib damage, bidets really ruin the aesthetics of the natural breast. So all the young teenagers who are caught up in this ideology - often as a result of poor body image and low self esteem - then end up with damaged and unappealing breasts, which must make body image issues so much worse whether they transition or detransition

Doesn't it also make treating breast cancer more difficult?

Because the tissue has been broken up/damaged and is no longer all in one place?

So long term this could kill them because a mastectomy ( for cancer purposes ) will be less effective

TheWeeDonkey · 09/11/2021 06:57

This makes me glad I don't have daughters. I know for many, especially of a vulnerable age this is a fashion choice, like dyeing your hair or Air Jordans, but that a shop (that should have an ounce of responsibility towards its customers) should promote it this way is chilling.

Makes you wonder what other harmful and potentially debilitating products they're selling?

Santastuckincustoms · 09/11/2021 07:02

I can't understand trans ideology at all. If men can be women when they have a penis why are girls encouraged to bind and not just be a bloke with a rack?

Whatwouldscullydo · 09/11/2021 07:05

I can't understand trans ideology at all. If men can be women when they have a penis why are girls encouraged to bind and not just be a bloke with a rack?

Funnily enough there seem to he 2 types of non binary too. One involves orange crop tops and a tutu and one involves binding.

I'll leave ve you to wonder what type applies to who 🤔

EishetChayil · 09/11/2021 07:07

This is what generations of capitalist patriarchy have done. Breasts have become such a locus of male desire that many young women now want to suppress or eradicate them - the source of life and nurturing.

NellieEllie · 09/11/2021 07:11

Lush providing supplies to children for self harm.
Commercial great binders are the ones that have been found to have the most ill effects.
Including lung damage.

Sexnotgender · 09/11/2021 07:20

Doesn't it also make treating breast cancer more difficult?

Because the tissue has been broken up/damaged and is no longer all in one place?

Oh wow, is that true? It makes sense but sweet Jesus 😞 I hope that’s not true.

OP posts:
DogDaysNeverEnd · 09/11/2021 07:22

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Doubletoilandtrouble · 09/11/2021 07:22

Harder to treat breast cancer? That is so heartbreaking Sad

KittenKong · 09/11/2021 07:22

At a mainline station too. How many parents are merrily waving their girls off for a ‘day shopping in London’ when they are trotting off to Lush to pick up their modern instruments of torture.

I’m sure the staff will be hi-5ing them and providing all the affirmation they can handle. It will be a fashionable thing to do.

Sexnotgender · 09/11/2021 07:24

@CheeseMmmm

Insurance for what?

I think the binders are being distributed by a separate org anyway.

For the time when everyone wakes up, realises the damage and sues the company that provided the product that caused the damage.
OP posts:
heldinadream · 09/11/2021 07:27

They'll be offering FGM next. Horrendous.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 09/11/2021 07:32

Good to see that the majority of comments on that dreadful Instagram posts are outraged. Imagine being the parent of a teenager and discovering that Lush are colluding with distressed girls who hate their bodies, enabling them to self harm in secret?

What a world that has such toxic adults and companies in it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread