Catching up on yesterday's tweets am I right in reading that Harrop has admitted a number of the allegations and the next step is for the tribunal to look at the ones that are to be determined?
Ish.
Harrop has to finish his evidence.
If there are any more defence witnesses, they will give evidence.
Both barristers will give closing submissions - basically an executive summary of the evidence they think is important and they think the panel should pay attention to.
In the jurisdictions I'm familiar with, the legal advisor would then summarise the relevant law. But I don't think the MPTS has a legal advisor - I think they have a legally qualified chair instead - and I don't know how that works there.
I would anticipate at some point in all that there will be legal wranglings about what to do about the VICE article, but I am not even begin to guess how that will play out.
Then the panel will retire to make their decision. They will need to produce it in writing which, in my jurisdiction, would take a couple of days. I don't know if having a legally qualified chair would speed that up or not.