@Cwenthryth
Okay. Well here’s hoping for an outcome that suitably reflects the severity of his offences 🤞🏻
That last tweet with the allegation and apparent threat against a named individual, is outside of the scope of the current allegation before this tribunal, which sets very specific dates it is interested in. It does say the allegation “may be amended as the hearing proceeds” so I guess it could become included though.
Vanishingly unlikely to become amended to significantly change the date range. It's an important principle of law that the defendent knows what htey're accused of well in advance of the hearing.
Any amendments can only be made if they're fair and in the interests of justice. Amendments are typically things like minor changes in dates (someone is accused of doing someting on the 14th of July; it becomes apparent it happened on the 15th) or withdrawing charges where it becomes clear there's no good evidence for them.
Adding what are effectively new criticisms at the last minute is likely to be seen as unfair. The only exception I can see in this case is what's called a 'joinder application'. So there's the date range in the initial charges, there are further charges in the pipeline and everyone agrees that, since they're similar in nature, it would make sense to join them together and hear them in one case.
Doesn't stop a new case being brought regarding those posts, down the line, mind.