"So, I can only interpret this as you admitting that there is a prevalence of males ‘flashing’ at women in women’s toilets. Your admitting it happens and, by your assertion that there are so many females beating up males who access the female toilets, we can take it you accept it happens often."
May I suggest you give your skills at interpreting an overhaul? No, I doubt very much that there's a prevalence of males 'flashing' at women in women's toilets. But by all means provide the evidence for its prevalence, as I asked. :)
"So, your breezy Not flashing at a woman, mind you, but actually beating one up? was indeed a very interesting distinction to your post. Very enlightening and very much focuses a spotlight to your intentions to distract with misinformation and dismissal, knowing that even you have to acknowledge that the prevalence of males exposing their penises in women’s toilets cannot be denied."
It's not actually me, and those who support a similar view, who's doing most of the distracting and dismissing in this debate. It's your side, frankly. The evidence of transwomen even flashing in women's toilets, let alone attacking them more severely than that (can we agree that 'attacking' is worse than 'flashing at'?) is sparse at best. Yet, for some reason, it's been turned into an unholy terror.
It's currently estimated that about one in a hundred people are transgender. Some two thirds of those will be transwomen. Of those transwomen who even have the courage to use a public toilet, and opt for a women's toilet, most will want to get in and out without incident. Well, obviously, because that's what most people of any sex/gender want to do. Of those men who want to attack, or flash at, women, only a few will be weird and daft enough (for all sorts of reasons) to think that the best place to do that will be in a women's toilet. Of those, I'd imagine the tiniest few would have their heads together well enough to be deterred by any law or any sign on the door of a women's toilet.
This debate, for me, has been much more about women's fears than realities. The former are of course valid and not to be dismissed - but it seems the realities - particularly likelihoods of certain horrors ever happening - have been largely swept aside. Relatedly: the very first thing to do when dealing with a fear is to learn to know your enemy. Frankly, I see little of that here with regard to transwomen.
I see even less regard for the safety of transwomen. They are humans, and have the human right to physical safety. For whatever reason they transition, I don't expect it's done for frivolous reasons. I don't like to see people who are already having very hard lives made any harder than necessary.