YY I know.
The point I'm trying to make (not very well!)
Is that while women are thinking of multiple groups-
Women girls
Certain religious beliefs
Men and boys (in theory women can use their spaces and loads would really hate that esp teen boys find it mortifying)
Other groups of men at risk from male violence of which there are plenty
Etc
And also thinking of not this individual or that individual but the risk from males as a group, the worryingly large minority of whom enjoy upsetting / scaring and onto sex offences etc. And that self ID allows ANY male in no questions asked.
Often as in this example the person is literally only thinking of themselves. I don't feel safe. I will feel safe in there. I'm only one person. Why so horrible? Do they want me to be hurt (possibly maybe)? Saying I'm a risk is an assumption and an insult...
And when we argue our points about groups etc. It won't work. Because they are only thinking of themselves. Literally.
I mean that's some.
Others who argue for it
Like winding women up, upsetting them.
Like having the opportunity to spell out that we are prey, that they don't care.
Getting women to post personal accounts of dodgy creepy men, assault etc. And then saying so what.
Enjoying seeing women put in their place, telling us to shut up, do as you're told, you don't matter, males do.
And of course the ones who for obvious reasons will relish the opportunities afforded by being able to wander into places where girls and women want to be private, are in a state of undress, and of course all the other numerous things where we are simply more comfy with females eg talking about menopause or.. well loads of stuff.
It doesn't matter what we say.
Logic will not win this argument IMO.