She seems to see this as some sort of case that will reverberate through the medical world and cause the NHS to throw caution to the winds and follow WPATH "guidelines" of enough of her patients will say how wonderful she is
She doesn't seem to understand what the tribunal is for.
The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, between March 2016 and November 2016, Dr Webberley failed to provide good clinical care to three patients, and that in September 2016 she prescribed inappropriately to two patients.
'Good clinical care' and appropriate prescribing are surely defined by the regulators. These are not negotiable. If she thinks they are wrong, this is not the time and place to try to change them.
The tribunal will further inquire into allegations that Dr Webberley’s conduct was dishonest in relation to information she provided to the GMC and the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, and in her failure to provide relevant information to a pharmacy.
I don't think patient testimonials can get her off the hook if it turns out she has been dishonest and failed to provide relevant information.
The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, when acting as the principal provider of the Gender GP website, Dr Webberley attempted to avoid the regulatory framework of the United Kingdom
This is completely unrelated to how her patients feel about their care. The regulatory framework is there for a reason, and Dr Webberley is not exempt from having to comply with it.
She seems to think the tribunal is a platform to promote her beliefs and her wish to change the UK protocols on treatment, when in fact it's a tribunal about her misconduct and making a decision about whether she should continue to be suspended, removed permanently from the medical register or have her licence to practice reinstated.