I don't think your argument makes sense here, I don't think the trans inclusionary argument of 'everyone deserves to have rights and be respected' is a typically right wing one.
That isn’t the argument made by gender ideologists like Black. The argument being made is that affirmation of individual identity is more important than structural analysis of inequality and balanced rights.
Trans women are women, you may not agree but that is what's accepted in law and it's what the majority of people believe
No it isn’t, hence all the exceptions where this doesn’t apply.
am fed up of hearing Gender Critical people claim they are campaigning for women's rights when all they seem to do day in day out is actively hurt women. Domestic violence has risen over the last year, sexual assault prosecutions have dropped, women are disproportionally affected by the pandemic when it comes to job losses. None of this apparently seems to matter to Gender Critical people, they quite happy to divert attention away from real feminist efforts to get angry anout public toilets.
Julie Bindel and Karen Ingala Smith are probably the most high profile campaigners against domestic violence today.
Women are disproportionately affected by the pandemic because of their sex. Their gender identity or lack of one is irrelevant. People like Black campaign to replace language and legislation that refers to sex with language and legislation that refers to gender, but gender identity has no objective meaning so women’s rights and protections are wiped out.
The toilets issue is easy to solve. There is a need for both sex segregated and unisex provision.
Women are concerned about sharing space with MEN. Gender ideology (as supported by Black) is more concerned with affirming individuals than protecting the rights of trans people, who she wouldn’t be able to define in any objective sense.