@StealthPolarBear
On Twitter, no reference.
If this is true it's a travesty.
I find it very hard to believe.
Conflating the average age of a murder victim of any group with the life expectancy of the whole group is always going to lead to alarming claims.
But this is simply one of those mistakes that grew legs and arms and a head and ran off with the truth.
If you follow the sources of this claim, it was an interview with someone talking about black murder victims in the US. There was a reference to where that stat came from, and of course the source was concerned with the average age of a murder victim of that very specific group (black male homosexual transsexuals in the US).
That specific stat then got smeared across completely different groups of transgender individuals (who are not black, male, US-residents, homosexual or transsexuals).
The misrepresented number has shock value, which gives those using the number power in a debate. A bit of maths is also all you need ro show this stat is claiming an impossibility.
From empirical data on non-homosexual transsexuals we know that their median age of transition is mid-40s to mid-50s. Even more research data shows that they outnumber homosexual transsexuals by around 9 to 1.
So, if you took that 35 number at face value, to arrive at it mathematically, as an average life expectancy, an awful lot of people would have to die before they are born (minus numbers only working in maths obviously, not in real life).
But I don't think facts really matter when the shock value of a misunderstood number brings more results.