It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to . . .

[FindTheTruth]

Here are some clarifications trending on twitter! What's yours?

• It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to finish up the last of the toilet paper without replacing it

• It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to break into a museum and draw moustaches on all portraits

• It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to redecorate your house if she doesn't like your wallpaper

• It's important to emphasize that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to tempt your cat away from home with Dreamies and claim it was hers all along.

• It’s important to emphasize that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to come round and sing opera through your front door

There's marmite in our butter and butter in our marmite. I'm fine with the slobby state of affairs. It'd be another matter if jam was introduced into the equation.
Please don't sneak jam in Maya!

My partner has trained our children to use a jam spoon. I get a right ticking off for using the knife and licking it afterwards

• It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to lick knives.

It is important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to move to Mornington Crescent from Totteridge and Whetstone after a Goodge Street opener, even when rule 8 is not in force. Nor does it give Maya Forstater the right to use the Arbuckle gambit at will.

Nor does it give Maya Forstater the right to use the Arbuckle gambit at will.

But at least she will get to use it in games played between the next hearing and its judgment, so it wasn't a total waste of time.

Unless CGD decide to settle, of course, in which case she only gets a singleton on the day it's announced, which probably will be of little practical use.

OP

You quoted me in your opening post, I'm going to make myself a chuffy badge in suffragette colours.

I wonder if they will settle? The company will work in their best interests. Last year I would have guessed they wouldn't have settled, but things have changed and Stonewall law has been widely discussed.
We would be better off with the full hearing, win or lose but these things are very stressful and the tribunal would take a dim view if CGD offered a good settlement and Maya turned it down. Rock/hard place.

It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to post in AIBU without actually specifying what she may (or may not) be unreasonable about.

Oh god I had the jam argument on mn once.

Apparently if you put butter in the jam it makes it mouldy. And actually now I've stopped it doesn't go mouldy unless I've made it and it wasn't hot enough

Jury was a bit out about the okayness of just skimming that bit off (mould has roots ....)

So now two knives/ spoon and knife but the bonus is two to lick!

Marmite is ok.

It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to protest butter in the marmite.

It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to claim that she is, in fact, a biological male and make us all pretend we believe her. Nor does it give her the right to squeeze peaches at the supermarket.

@sashh

OP

You quoted me in your opening post, I'm going to make myself a chuffy badge in suffragette colours.

However it is important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to make herself a chuffy badge in suffragette colours.

@MForstater has just been observed brazenly posting the following article on Twitter.

Badly behaved woman makes history

No shame. She's out of control.

We're all going to get butter in our jam, I can feel it.

It's important to emphasise that the ruling does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to put jam before cream on scones.

Sorry to report, @WarOnWoman, but Maya's decline has continued:

twitter.com/MForstater/status/1554510734075330560

I didn't know you knew my sons!

No problem with the order there but her cream looks a bit runny. Regardless of that fact, it's important to remember that the ruling does not give Maya the right to look back in anger or go breaking my heart

Thank you for resurrecting this thread, I missed it first time round

On a related matter I don't believe the ruling gave Maya the right to call a scone, a scone.

Thank you for resurrecting this thread, I missed it first time round.

+1

If she's in Torquay she'll be cancelled for cultural appropriation. It's jam before cream in Cornwall and cream before jam in Devon.

When I was in Cornwall a few years ago, the café owner said it is easy to remember:

Jesus Christ! JC Jam and then Cream 😀

(Devon is obviously the opposite.)

The best response I ever saw was: if you get it wrong in the relevant county, turn your scone upside down.

And remember to pronounce your scone as 'scone'! 😆

Did anyone say 'shot in your toilet whilst delivering your package?

Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit.

😂😂😂👌🏿

I thought this one had gone to appeal?

I'm so happy that no one else said it's important that this does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to set her pet spiders loose on your overnight line dried washing to rub their willies on

It's important to emphasise that this does NOT give Maya Forstater the right to exemption from imprisonment in one of those "compassionate non-violent" gulags when the revolution comes. It's the kind thing to do.