@ASugarr
https://twitter.com/GcHomophobia/status/1330813550156189696?s=19 Here's a bunch of information on their previous statements. Let's also not forget they are anti-abortion, pro-conversion therapy, Biphobic, the people involved are all connected to anti-LGB religious groups and so much more.
OK so I've looked at your thread. A lot of stuff about Malcolm Clark, a gay man who attended LGBT clubs at school and as a result thinks they are not a good idea due to safeguarding issues. You may not agree with his stance, but it isn't homophobic. It's up to you to make the case for why we should have them, not smear someone who went to them.
Alison Bailey objecting to the Pride train pumping out Pride related messages and literature. I recall a gay man at the time saying he thought the whole idea was appalling - he just wanted to get from A to B with minimum fuss just like everyone else and the train was not the place for forcing passengers to listen to messages about gay acceptance whether they wanted to or not.
Alison Bailey saying that a 12 year old is a child and should not be put in with adults and labelled LGBTQ+, but be allowed to grow up without adult agendas. Speaking as a parent, you're absolutely right Alison.
LGB Alliance USA saying that they don't represent asexuals because not wanting sex, a perfectly legitimate option, but it isn't a sexual orientation, which it isn't.
Alison Bailey being called a homophobe for saying in a tweet that she doesn't condone racist or homophobic behaviour, she abhors it. 'GC Homophobia' is certainly imaginative.
Well - you've got the gist. The bottom line is calling people who disagree with you 'transphobic' 'homophobic' etc is not a substitute for a proper argument.